Skip to main content

2014 Outlook – Extrusion Industry Sees Eventful Year in US/China Trade Case

Jeff Henderson,
AEC Director of Operations
In our essentiALs January 22nd email, AEC members were updated about the recent events in the China import case. Now, I’d like to outline the key issues for 2014. There are three significant areas the industry will focus on this year. The first is administrative reviews, the second is scope requests, and the third is the continued lobbying efforts on Capitol Hill.

The first annual Administrative Review came to an end in late 2013, and the second review is now well underway. As you may recall, there were over 60 Chinese extruders and U.S. importers that sought separate countervailing (CVD) and anti-dumping (AD) rates from the combined People’s Republic of China (PRC)-wide entity rate of over 160 percent. The Department of Commerce (DOC) selected three companies to review as being representative for all requests. In these reviews, the respondents attempt to lower their dumping and subsidy margins by demonstrating that they are not part of the PRC-wide entity and have not received countervailable subsidies. Going into the first administrative reviews, the prevailing rates were between 8 and 127 percent in the CVD review and between 32 and 33 percent for AD. At the conclusion of the first administrative reviews, the Department determined that the mandatory respondents (i.e., the two companies directly examined) received between 1.5- and 15.6-percent CVD margins and the 59 non-reviewed respondents received an average CVD margin of over 10 percent. The PRC-wide CVD rate remained 127 percent. In the AD review, the Department determined that except for one mandatory respondent, the other 9 respondent companies considered in the review had AD margins of over 32 percent. The PRC-wide AD rate remained 33 percent.

In the second administrative review, there are approximately 141 respondent companies seeking to reduce their dumping margins and approximately 70 companies seeking to reduce their subsidy margins. Of these companies, the Department once again selected two companies (Kromet International Inc. and Jiangsu Changfa) for individual examination in the CVD review and two companies (Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co. Ltd. and Zhongya/Guang Ya Group/Xingya) for individual examination in the AD review. The Department will issue its preliminary AD and CVD determinations by June 18th.

There are 25 scope decisions awaiting decisions. Now that the first administrative review is complete, we expect to see a series of decisions from the DOC in the coming weeks and months. The first decision of note will concern unitized curtain wall. The AEC also continues to actively examine all avenues of possible circumvention of the orders. As the AEC develops credible evidence of circumvention, it will actively and aggressively pursue all possible violators.

The third area of our 2014 agenda is the extension of the industry’s lobbying efforts in Washington. As previously reported in essentiALs, several AEC members made a trip to DC late last summer encouraging the DOC and several members of Congress to remain strong in their interpretation and application of the original orders that only kitted products that are packed, shipped, and complete as finished products are to be excluded. Many extruders became concerned that the ‘bright blue line’ drawn between kitted subassemblies and kitted finished products in the original orders has been eroded in decisions in the second half of 2013. With by-partisan support of 17 House members and 13 Senators a letter to the Department was sponsored and signed expressing the concerns of the Congressman and Senators over the Department’s recent narrowing of its interpretation of the scope of the orders and encouraged the Department to maintain the original ‘bright blue line’. A follow up meeting with the DOC will occur very soon by AEC staff and members so we can make our case directly. We will also offer helpful input to Commerce on ways they can view incoming product requests in a fair and expeditious manner. However, we won’t stop there. The contacts and lines of communication that we’re establishing in Washington will continue to be developed in 2014. The AEC will continue to make our voice heard in DC.

This year certainly will be busy and extruders’ confidence should remain high! We will continue to be successful in defending the orders we fought so hard to win. Volunteer efforts by the industry representatives, new staffing at the AEC, and our solid funding base will work together to keep our industry protected from these illegal and unfair trade practices. In my next blog entry I’ll discuss the funding plans for 2014. The extrusion industry should be proud of the way it’s come together in this important area, and with its continued support, we will remain successful.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Several Key Issues in Play

As we head into December there are several key issues in play.

Sunset Review Wiley Rein has gathered information from the industry and is quickly converting that into a filing for our case.  They have told me that we had a good representation of the industry in the data collected.

Remaining Timeline January 10, 2017Prehearing Report Issued
January 18, 2017 Prehearing Briefs
January 19, 2017 Request to appear at Hearing
January 25, 2017 Prehearing Conference
January 26, 2017 Hearing
February 6, 2017 Post-Hearing Briefs
February 23, 2017 Report to the Commission (APO Release)
March 1, 2017         APO Release
March 3, 2017         Final Comments
March 10, 2017         Commission Vote
March 27, 2017         Determination Expected

Administrative Review We received the DOC’s final determination in this year’s Administrative Review.  As expected, Commerce found that Chinese producers dumped aluminum extrusions in the U.S. market during the period of review (May 2014-April 2015) in margins r…

Chinese Extrusion Transshipments through Vietnam

In recent months there have been a growing number of reports about aluminum extrusions being imported into the United States from Vietnam.  This recent spike comes at a time when the AEC is watching such reports and import data very carefully.  Given the current policies of the Government of China to export their way out of their self-created overcapacity problems, the AEC is becoming more concerned about the prospect of transshipments from Chinese extruders through Vietnam.

AEC members are asked to contact Jeff Henderson with any reports gathered from the field regarding Vietnamese extrusions coming into the U.S.  All reports will be treated in strict confidence.  It must be determined whether or not there is a pattern in what is being imported.  This pattern could appear in end use markets being targeted, names of the companies exporting product from Vietnam, types of extrusions and finishing, etc.

So, please let Jeff know what you are seeing in the field.  He can be reached at 847.…

Special Report: Details Behind the China Zhongwang Case Filing

As noted in our post from October 23, the Aluminum Extruders Council filed a Circumvention and Scope Clarification case against China Zhongwang (ZW).  Mounting evidence from private investigators, testimony from former employees, data from online import and export databases, and anecdotal evidence from a variety of reporters and other sources made it quite clear that ZW has consistently and systematically been exporting aluminum extrusions that are simply welded together into what are essentially aluminum slabs.  While they claim these so-called ‘deep-processed’ extrusions are aluminum pallets, there is no evidence that ZW or any of its U.S. based operations market such a product.  It is simply incomprehensible that a company would export hundreds of millions of pounds of these extrusions into the U.S. without even marketing them.

The feedback we’ve received so far indicate that ZW intends to do with these extrusions what they have done in Mexico and Vietnam with similar schemes: sen…