Skip to main content

June Shaping Up to be Busy Month for Fair Trade

This month has shaped up so far to be a hectic and busy month on the AEC Fair Trade front. Three main issues have been at the forefront: the results of the Department of Commerce (DOC) announcement of its Preliminary Decision in the Third Administrative Review, the developments from Washington D.C. in the Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) bill, and circumvention.

Preliminary Results of Third Administrative Review
The DOC announced what amounts to a ‘preliminary’ preliminary finding in our industry’s third administrative review.  The Preliminary Decision was released June 2, 2015.  Here is the breakdown of their determination thus far: Anti-Dumping (AD) rates remain at 33%.  Jangho and Yuanda, the first & second mandatory respondents, received Adverse Facts Available (AFA), which is 33%.  It was announced that the third mandatory respondent, Union, received 0%.  However, there was a glaring error in that calculation.  So, the DOC will have to go back, recalculate, and announce the right figure.  It is unclear when they will do that.  The “All Others” category remained at 32%.

On the Countervailing Duty (CVD) side, the rates were in the low single digits, but the announcement did not include the calculation for primary aluminum, extrusion, or glass (in the case of JangHo).  Since these are the most significant elements in calculating the margin, we see the rates announced as too incomplete to justify any comment at this time.  It is not clear when the DOC will announce the full calculation.  They could do so in a few weeks in a ‘post’ Preliminary Decision, or wait until December when they are due to announce their Final Determination.  The rates announced were: Jangho – 1.61%, Guanga – 4.83%, and All Others – 3.22%.  Due to the DOC’s current backlog, they have recently been announcing incomplete results in their preliminary decisions.  So, the partial announcement is not an indication of the final result – good or bad.

What is promising is that the DOC did use Thailand as the surrogate country, as we had hoped, and will include glass in the calculations for the two extruders that supply extrusions in curtain wall applications.

TPA Bill
On the Hill in the last few days, there has been headline news generated as the debate continues on the Trade Promotion Authority bill and its amendments.  Last Friday, breaking news out of Washington pronounced the death of TPA and a major defeat for the administration.  However, our amendment, Customs Reauthorization, did pass.   The latest information is that only the TAA bill and TPA are absolutely linked. Customs reauthorization, which contains our provisions, may be able to be conferenced without the other bills passing. While we don't think that will happen, it is an interesting wrinkle.  All in all - this has been a very successful effort to get this far! Now we just need to get our provisions through a conference.  Be on alert for another email asking for your continued help!

Circumvention
And finally: circumvention.  As you may have seen in our trade alert a couple of weeks ago, the main defendant in the Puerto Rico case was sentenced to 18 months in prison.  This was great news for our industry, because it sent the message to those that are circumventing our orders that jail time is a real possibility if caught.  Circumvention is the most active component of our China Trade workload these days at headquarters.  Right now, there are upwards of 10 cases at various stages of investigation.  I head to Washington later this month, where I will discuss legal and political opportunities for the industry in dealing with these cases.  It is becoming clear to me that certain Chinese extruders are driving this activity, and it’s time for us to find a path to address them at a higher level.  Stay tuned for more updates.  I am pleased to announce that Michael Walsh, Director, ADCVD Policy & Programs Division, U.S. Customs, has accepted our invitation to speak at the AEC Management conference this September.  I think his presence at our conference, and his message, will come at an opportune time.

Thanks to your continued support and efforts, we have engaged those that leveraged unfair and illegal trade actions to dismantle our domestic market.  I am pleased to say that on every front we continue to gain ground.  Stay tuned and be ready!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fair Trade Update: Curtain Wall, Door Thresholds & Vietnam

Well, our year is off and running with a bang. Scope issues, Administrative Review, and circumvention top our list in early 2018.

This month we learned that there will be an appeal in the curtain wall scope case.  Permasteelisa and Jangho filed a notice of appeal last week.  It is expected that Yuanda will almost surely file their own notice of appeal by the deadline, which is February 12. The Chinese industry signaled that they would appeal in a recent article in US Glass magazine.   

Additionally, our scope challenge related to door thresholds continues to move forward.  This is a significant case because door thresholds are expressly mentioned as subject merchandise in our trade orders.  So, to lose this application could open the door to many applications clearly covered by our case.  Finally, we continue to await the judges’ (there are more than one judge at the CIT) decision in the appliance handles cases we defended last fall.  We believe we will win.  However, we are mostly i…

AEC Duties Unchanged; “Trumponomics” Impacts Extruders

Our 6th Annual Administrative Review results have been announced.  As previously reported, the Department of Commerce (DOC) maintained extrusion tariffs at 86.01% for our subsidy, or countervailing duty (CVD), case and 20% for our anti-dumping (AD) case.  The combined duty of 106% has been stable since 2016.  This is a good number for the industry, which continues to contain Chinese aluminum extrusion at less than 1% market share. Furthermore, the DOC also assigned the Adverse Facts Available (AFA) rate of 198.61% to the two mandatory respondents, Liaoning Zhongwang Group Co., Ltd. and Liaoyang Zhongwang Aluminum Profile Co. Ltd., which has been the AFA rate since the 5th review.  The 7th Annual Administrative Review has begun with the selection of mandatory respondents. 

Elsewhere in our case, there is nothing new to report on the scope issues we are battling.  We continue to wait for court dates or decisions depending on the matter.  Our trade enforcement actions and results have ma…

Our China Trade Case – Remember That?

It’s sometimes hard to remember that the AEC has a trade case against China.  With all of the news regarding the 232 Investigation, the Russian Sanctions, and the fallout we’ve experienced, I find myself having to leave tasks on my calendar to be sure I am dialed into the ins and outs of our anti-dumping/countervailing duties (AD/CVD) cases.  When I do review the cases and get dialed in again, I am quite happy with how it’s going.

That’s because our initiatives are starting to gain traction.  Take, for example, our Vietnam Circumvention case.  The deadline for filing briefs in this matter has come and gone with no reply from the other side.  Therefore, we are in a strong position to ask the Department of Commerce for their preliminary ruling so that duties can be applied at once.  The final ruling in this matter is due December 24, 2018.  However, the sooner we can get to a preliminary decision, the better for our domestic industry.  There will be more to come on this in the coming we…