Skip to main content

June Shaping Up to be Busy Month for Fair Trade

This month has shaped up so far to be a hectic and busy month on the AEC Fair Trade front. Three main issues have been at the forefront: the results of the Department of Commerce (DOC) announcement of its Preliminary Decision in the Third Administrative Review, the developments from Washington D.C. in the Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) bill, and circumvention.

Preliminary Results of Third Administrative Review
The DOC announced what amounts to a ‘preliminary’ preliminary finding in our industry’s third administrative review.  The Preliminary Decision was released June 2, 2015.  Here is the breakdown of their determination thus far: Anti-Dumping (AD) rates remain at 33%.  Jangho and Yuanda, the first & second mandatory respondents, received Adverse Facts Available (AFA), which is 33%.  It was announced that the third mandatory respondent, Union, received 0%.  However, there was a glaring error in that calculation.  So, the DOC will have to go back, recalculate, and announce the right figure.  It is unclear when they will do that.  The “All Others” category remained at 32%.

On the Countervailing Duty (CVD) side, the rates were in the low single digits, but the announcement did not include the calculation for primary aluminum, extrusion, or glass (in the case of JangHo).  Since these are the most significant elements in calculating the margin, we see the rates announced as too incomplete to justify any comment at this time.  It is not clear when the DOC will announce the full calculation.  They could do so in a few weeks in a ‘post’ Preliminary Decision, or wait until December when they are due to announce their Final Determination.  The rates announced were: Jangho – 1.61%, Guanga – 4.83%, and All Others – 3.22%.  Due to the DOC’s current backlog, they have recently been announcing incomplete results in their preliminary decisions.  So, the partial announcement is not an indication of the final result – good or bad.

What is promising is that the DOC did use Thailand as the surrogate country, as we had hoped, and will include glass in the calculations for the two extruders that supply extrusions in curtain wall applications.

TPA Bill
On the Hill in the last few days, there has been headline news generated as the debate continues on the Trade Promotion Authority bill and its amendments.  Last Friday, breaking news out of Washington pronounced the death of TPA and a major defeat for the administration.  However, our amendment, Customs Reauthorization, did pass.   The latest information is that only the TAA bill and TPA are absolutely linked. Customs reauthorization, which contains our provisions, may be able to be conferenced without the other bills passing. While we don't think that will happen, it is an interesting wrinkle.  All in all - this has been a very successful effort to get this far! Now we just need to get our provisions through a conference.  Be on alert for another email asking for your continued help!

And finally: circumvention.  As you may have seen in our trade alert a couple of weeks ago, the main defendant in the Puerto Rico case was sentenced to 18 months in prison.  This was great news for our industry, because it sent the message to those that are circumventing our orders that jail time is a real possibility if caught.  Circumvention is the most active component of our China Trade workload these days at headquarters.  Right now, there are upwards of 10 cases at various stages of investigation.  I head to Washington later this month, where I will discuss legal and political opportunities for the industry in dealing with these cases.  It is becoming clear to me that certain Chinese extruders are driving this activity, and it’s time for us to find a path to address them at a higher level.  Stay tuned for more updates.  I am pleased to announce that Michael Walsh, Director, ADCVD Policy & Programs Division, U.S. Customs, has accepted our invitation to speak at the AEC Management conference this September.  I think his presence at our conference, and his message, will come at an opportune time.

Thanks to your continued support and efforts, we have engaged those that leveraged unfair and illegal trade actions to dismantle our domestic market.  I am pleased to say that on every front we continue to gain ground.  Stay tuned and be ready!


Popular posts from this blog

Fair Trade Update: Curtain Wall, Door Thresholds & Vietnam

Well, our year is off and running with a bang. Scope issues, Administrative Review, and circumvention top our list in early 2018.

This month we learned that there will be an appeal in the curtain wall scope case.  Permasteelisa and Jangho filed a notice of appeal last week.  It is expected that Yuanda will almost surely file their own notice of appeal by the deadline, which is February 12. The Chinese industry signaled that they would appeal in a recent article in US Glass magazine.   

Additionally, our scope challenge related to door thresholds continues to move forward.  This is a significant case because door thresholds are expressly mentioned as subject merchandise in our trade orders.  So, to lose this application could open the door to many applications clearly covered by our case.  Finally, we continue to await the judges’ (there are more than one judge at the CIT) decision in the appliance handles cases we defended last fall.  We believe we will win.  However, we are mostly i…

WOW! Did he say ‘Billion’?

The biggest news to hit the trade case came last month.  The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a complaint against Perfectus seeking $1.5 Billion in unpaid duties for the fake pallets exported to the United States.  The DOJ didn’t pull any punches in their submission.  From the complaint, the DOJ stated, “Zhongtian Liu, a Chinese national, is the founder and chairman of China Zhongwang, one of the world’s largest industrial aluminum extrusion companies. Zhongtian Liu controls and is effectively the owner of Perfectus Aluminum, Inc. (“Perfectus”).  Between 2011 and at least 2014, Zhongtian Liu used Perfectus to illegally import more than 2.1 million aluminum “pallets” from China into the United States, as described in detail below.2 The “pallets” were manufactured by China Zhongwang and/or its affiliates and “sold” to Perfectus by several intermediary entities, including Dalian Liwang Trade Co., Ltd., Zhongwang Investment Group, and Yingkou Quianxiang Trading. Many of these intermediar…

Heating Up & Settling Down: The Dichotomy of our Trade Case

The agenda for our trade case continues to be driven by transshipment/circumvention issues and the 232 Investigation.  Meanwhile, our ‘base case’ is so quiet that we’ve been able to free up budget dollars from the Administrative Review to finance our circumvention case against Vietnam.

The Administrative Review is now complete.  The final rates determined by the Department of Commerce are 86% for countervailing duty (CVD) and 16% for anti-dumping duty (AD).  The total of 102% is our highest rate since we first filed the case.

Scope issues have calmed down a lot.  In fact, only the curtain wall case, the appliance handles case, and door threshold cases are on the front burner.  Reports from the hearing for the curtain wall case were very positive.  The attorney leading that effort, David Spooner, is quite confident we will win this round.  Of course, we fully expect another appeal from the Chinese.  We are awaiting the decision from the judge in the appliance handle cases and believe w…