Skip to main content

November 2015 Update: U.S. Fair Trade Case against China

We have had a great deal of activity recently on the Fair Trade front. Over the last few weeks, the Aluminum Extruders Council (AEC) Fair Trade case has:

  1. Requested a full investigation of allegations that Zhongwang (ZW) is transshipping aluminum extrusions through Vietnam and Malaysia into the U.S. in a plan designed to evade duties.
  2. Filed a Scope Clarification and Circumvention case against ZW at the Department of Commerce (DOC).  The AEC claimed ZW has not paid duties on subject merchandise they have brought into their warehouses in Southern California and then shipped to their facility in Delair, NJ only to be re-melted into billet.
  3. Received the post-preliminary results from the DOC on the CVD side of the 3rd annual review.
  4. Launched the 4th annual review process.
  5. Continued to push the DOC for a November decision on the 5050 alloy scope request.

Please see our special report on the first two items.  This is a major undertaking for the Council and the first time we have confronted ZW about the dozens of reports we’ve received about their shipments to the U.S.

The Third Administrative Review is set to be complete, and the final results released, before the end of the year.  In the meantime, we finally received the preliminary results on the countervailing duty side of the case.   Those results are fantastic for our case.  The rates actually went up for the first time since we won the case.  The post-preliminary results deliver a CVD rate of 22% vs. the 9% rate we’ve had the last two years.  The reason for the increase is based on the respondents that the DOC recruited for this year’s review.  One of them supplies extrusions for the curtain wall industry.  Since their shipments included glass and components, those items were a part of the calculation.  This is a great win for us.  The AD side should be announced soon.  We also expect to hear good news on that one.

We continue to push the DOC to make a decision on the 5050 scope request.  They are telling us they will announce that decision in November.  Since we plan a November meeting with the DOC, we will push on this again, if they haven’t announced a decision.  With the filing of the ZW case, we are also pulling the 5xxx alloy issue into our circumvention argument.  The idea here is simple, either the heat-treated so-called 5xxx series alloy extrusions are really 6xxx series disguised with some modest chemical changes and thus covered by our orders, OR this is simply a circumvention scheme to avoid duties.  Either way, we win.  I think news of this pending decision has seeped into the market.  I’ve received a few reports that some orders are returning to U.S. mills in the last few weeks.  If someone places an order today for this alloy, by the time it reaches a U.S. port it may very well be subject to duties!

The news continues to be good for our industry on the trade front.  Our Council’s profile is increasing in D.C. as we continue to defend our case.  This month, we actually went International.  Sapa volunteered to represent the AEC at two World Trade Organization panels in October.  These events were developed to educate the EU on issues of concern regarding China’s attempt to be recognized as a market economy.  We stood with many members of the steel industry and the European aluminum industry when making our case.  Thanks to Jason Weber of Sapa for making the trip.

Please stay tuned for more developments in the next few weeks.  I’ll be reporting on our trip to D.C. in a couple of weeks, we will be sending out a House letter for members to take to their Congressmen, and the results of the third administrative review will be announced.  So, again, thank you for your continued support.  Now more than ever we must stand together!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Nice Win to Start the Year!

 For months you’ve read my blog posts bemoaning the terrible decisions coming out of Washington D.C. related to our case.  Well, with the New Year, we have a fresh start.  And it’s a good one!  The industry has won its first Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) case involving fencing extrusions.  On December 20, 2023, Fortress withdrew its request for an administrative review, prompting U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) to terminate the administrative review entirely. Termination of the review makes the CBP’s affirmative determination of evasion final.  When terminating the review, CBP clarified that termination does not in any way preclude CBP or other agencies from pursuing additional enforcement actions against Fortress or imposing penalties should the need arise. The other EAPA fencing case is pending, and it appears the respondent is not participating.  We submitted voluntary factual information and the company in question did not submit writte...

Keep That Ram Moving Forward

By Jason Weber, AEC VP of Government Affairs   On June 17 th , the International Trade Commission (ITC) will issue the Final Producer Questionnaire in the Aluminum Extrusion AD/CVD cases .  The questionnaire is due 30 days after it is issued .  As always, we continue to update membership with Trade Alerts as appropriate to keep them informed .  Beyond the Final Producer Questionnaire, key upcoming dates are the Final Hearing on September 9, 2024, the Final Vote on October 23, 2024, and the Final Determination on November 11 , 2024.   In last month’s essentiALs article and Fair Trade blog post, I outlined the recent Department of Commerce (DOC) changes to the 232 Aluminum Tariffs .  In that article, I outlined the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) codes that were removed from the General Approved Exclusions (GAEs):    GAE. 1.A : HTS 7609000000 (Aluminum tube or pipe fittings (for example, couplings, elbows, sleeves);   GAE. 4.A : ...

Aluminum 232 Exclusion/Objection Process in Full Swing

Since our last update, the 232 exclusion/objection process is in full swing.  Over the last several weeks we have continued to refine the workflow and communication of the exclusion requests to make sure membership continues to receive the communications and objects when appropriate. For those members that have been working through the process we at AEC HQ thank you.  If for some reason you’re an AEC Extruder Member who should be receiving these communications, please let me know at jweber@tso.net and we’ll make sure you’re added to the distribution list. Although there are new companies submitting requests, we continue to see the same entities entering the bulk of the exclusion requests.  However, for the most part the exclusion requests are much the same with slight changes here and there.  This does simplify the objection process in a way where similar objections can be filed for multiple exclusion requests. As a reminder, price is not a valid reason for a company...