Skip to main content

2016 Will Be Pivotal Year for AEC’s Fair Trade Case

It is hard to believe that it was only five years ago that the U.S. aluminum extrusion industry pulled its resources, data, and resolve together to petition the U.S. Federal Government to initiate tariffs against Chinese extrusion exporters using illegal and unfair trade practices.  Those orders transformed our industry into one of the most vibrant manufacturing niches in our economy.

All across the United States extruders are boasting of new equipment, new market opportunities, and a positive outlook going into 2016.  That is not the case for other aluminum semis coming out of China.  Foil, sheet, and plate are all witnessing the invasion of cheap Chinese imports, which is not only eroding domestic production but also flooding the world with aluminum.  In hindsight it is clear that our industry was right when it determined it would either need to take trade action or watch the market go to the Chinese.

So, here we are at the five-year mark. This is the year we will be reapplying for protection.  Once again, we will all have to pull our data together for the Government.   We will be seeking an extension of the tariffs by making it clear that without trade protection our domestic industry will virtually vanish.  In the coming days, we will be sending out the template for data collection, and setting a series of conference calls in which members can ask questions or seek clarification as the process unfolds in the first quarter of 2016.  All members are welcome to submit data, and the more we get the stronger our case.

While the Expiry Review may be the biggest event for our case in 2016, it is not the only issue in play this year.  In the fall of 2015 the AEC launched a Scope Clarification/Circumvention case against China Zhongwang.  In December, the Department of Commerce (DOC) pushed their decision out until January.  So we look for a ruling from the DOC in the next few weeks.  Similarly, the DOC had postponed rulings on the 5000-series alloy scope requests until January.  Speculating that the DOC is positioning itself to rule on all of the questions being posed by these cases all at once, we look to have a resolution very soon.

And finally, just because we have our five-year anniversary review, it does not mean we skip this year’s Administrative Review.  So, there will be an Administrative Review running in parallel to the Expiry Review.  The Administrative Review will determine the tariff rates for 2016 and 2017.  As you may recall, we saw rates increase in 2015.  For the first time since the inception of our case, we actually saw tariffs increase!  Now, those that sought a special rate will get a countervailing duty (CVD) rate of 22%, and an antidumping duty (AD) rate of 86%.  This combined new rate of 108% is more than double last year’s rate of 42%.  So, we will be working hard to hold that ground in the forthcoming Administrative Review.

Maintaining our focus on this case and applying resources as needed has not only reversed any ambitions Chinese extruders had to capture our market, it has turned the tables in our favor.  Maintaining our orders with a successful Expiry Review is job one in 2016.  Along with that, we must continue to build on our wins with higher tariffs in 2016.  Lastly, we must remain vigilant when it comes to scope and circumvention issues.  Plugging holes that have developed as the exporters and importers seek ways to evade duties is key to our continued prosperity.  Without your support and involvement, none of this will happen.  So, let’s be sure to keep executing and driving our trade agenda into the New Year.

Comments

  1. Nickel based alloys such as Monel 400, Inconel 718, Inconel 600, Inconel 625 have widespread industrial uses. These alloys are most widely used in highly corrosive environments or high temperature environments. The price of nickel has skyrocketed over the last several years and demand has increased creating short-term shortages of material.

    Alloy Products

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fair Trade Update: Curtain Wall, Door Thresholds & Vietnam

Well, our year is off and running with a bang. Scope issues, Administrative Review, and circumvention top our list in early 2018.

This month we learned that there will be an appeal in the curtain wall scope case.  Permasteelisa and Jangho filed a notice of appeal last week.  It is expected that Yuanda will almost surely file their own notice of appeal by the deadline, which is February 12. The Chinese industry signaled that they would appeal in a recent article in US Glass magazine.   

Additionally, our scope challenge related to door thresholds continues to move forward.  This is a significant case because door thresholds are expressly mentioned as subject merchandise in our trade orders.  So, to lose this application could open the door to many applications clearly covered by our case.  Finally, we continue to await the judges’ (there are more than one judge at the CIT) decision in the appliance handles cases we defended last fall.  We believe we will win.  However, we are mostly i…

AEC Duties Unchanged; “Trumponomics” Impacts Extruders

Our 6th Annual Administrative Review results have been announced.  As previously reported, the Department of Commerce (DOC) maintained extrusion tariffs at 86.01% for our subsidy, or countervailing duty (CVD), case and 20% for our anti-dumping (AD) case.  The combined duty of 106% has been stable since 2016.  This is a good number for the industry, which continues to contain Chinese aluminum extrusion at less than 1% market share. Furthermore, the DOC also assigned the Adverse Facts Available (AFA) rate of 198.61% to the two mandatory respondents, Liaoning Zhongwang Group Co., Ltd. and Liaoyang Zhongwang Aluminum Profile Co. Ltd., which has been the AFA rate since the 5th review.  The 7th Annual Administrative Review has begun with the selection of mandatory respondents. 

Elsewhere in our case, there is nothing new to report on the scope issues we are battling.  We continue to wait for court dates or decisions depending on the matter.  Our trade enforcement actions and results have ma…

Our China Trade Case – Remember That?

It’s sometimes hard to remember that the AEC has a trade case against China.  With all of the news regarding the 232 Investigation, the Russian Sanctions, and the fallout we’ve experienced, I find myself having to leave tasks on my calendar to be sure I am dialed into the ins and outs of our anti-dumping/countervailing duties (AD/CVD) cases.  When I do review the cases and get dialed in again, I am quite happy with how it’s going.

That’s because our initiatives are starting to gain traction.  Take, for example, our Vietnam Circumvention case.  The deadline for filing briefs in this matter has come and gone with no reply from the other side.  Therefore, we are in a strong position to ask the Department of Commerce for their preliminary ruling so that duties can be applied at once.  The final ruling in this matter is due December 24, 2018.  However, the sooner we can get to a preliminary decision, the better for our domestic industry.  There will be more to come on this in the coming we…