Skip to main content

2016 Will Be Pivotal Year for AEC’s Fair Trade Case

It is hard to believe that it was only five years ago that the U.S. aluminum extrusion industry pulled its resources, data, and resolve together to petition the U.S. Federal Government to initiate tariffs against Chinese extrusion exporters using illegal and unfair trade practices.  Those orders transformed our industry into one of the most vibrant manufacturing niches in our economy.

All across the United States extruders are boasting of new equipment, new market opportunities, and a positive outlook going into 2016.  That is not the case for other aluminum semis coming out of China.  Foil, sheet, and plate are all witnessing the invasion of cheap Chinese imports, which is not only eroding domestic production but also flooding the world with aluminum.  In hindsight it is clear that our industry was right when it determined it would either need to take trade action or watch the market go to the Chinese.

So, here we are at the five-year mark. This is the year we will be reapplying for protection.  Once again, we will all have to pull our data together for the Government.   We will be seeking an extension of the tariffs by making it clear that without trade protection our domestic industry will virtually vanish.  In the coming days, we will be sending out the template for data collection, and setting a series of conference calls in which members can ask questions or seek clarification as the process unfolds in the first quarter of 2016.  All members are welcome to submit data, and the more we get the stronger our case.

While the Expiry Review may be the biggest event for our case in 2016, it is not the only issue in play this year.  In the fall of 2015 the AEC launched a Scope Clarification/Circumvention case against China Zhongwang.  In December, the Department of Commerce (DOC) pushed their decision out until January.  So we look for a ruling from the DOC in the next few weeks.  Similarly, the DOC had postponed rulings on the 5000-series alloy scope requests until January.  Speculating that the DOC is positioning itself to rule on all of the questions being posed by these cases all at once, we look to have a resolution very soon.

And finally, just because we have our five-year anniversary review, it does not mean we skip this year’s Administrative Review.  So, there will be an Administrative Review running in parallel to the Expiry Review.  The Administrative Review will determine the tariff rates for 2016 and 2017.  As you may recall, we saw rates increase in 2015.  For the first time since the inception of our case, we actually saw tariffs increase!  Now, those that sought a special rate will get a countervailing duty (CVD) rate of 22%, and an antidumping duty (AD) rate of 86%.  This combined new rate of 108% is more than double last year’s rate of 42%.  So, we will be working hard to hold that ground in the forthcoming Administrative Review.

Maintaining our focus on this case and applying resources as needed has not only reversed any ambitions Chinese extruders had to capture our market, it has turned the tables in our favor.  Maintaining our orders with a successful Expiry Review is job one in 2016.  Along with that, we must continue to build on our wins with higher tariffs in 2016.  Lastly, we must remain vigilant when it comes to scope and circumvention issues.  Plugging holes that have developed as the exporters and importers seek ways to evade duties is key to our continued prosperity.  Without your support and involvement, none of this will happen.  So, let’s be sure to keep executing and driving our trade agenda into the New Year.

Comments

  1. Nickel based alloys such as Monel 400, Inconel 718, Inconel 600, Inconel 625 have widespread industrial uses. These alloys are most widely used in highly corrosive environments or high temperature environments. The price of nickel has skyrocketed over the last several years and demand has increased creating short-term shortages of material.

    Alloy Products

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fair Trade Update: 232 Tariff Impacts Alarming Members, Foreign Imports Rising

Most of the activity this month related to fair and free trade was external to our ongoing trade cases against China.  Reports of increasing threats to the North American market from other countries continue to grow, and there is clear uncertainty about the impacts of the 232 tariff exemptions for Canada and Mexico on the U.S. industry.  I’ll come back to that in a minute, but first, let me catch you up on issues that did involve our China case.
The 8th Annual Administrative Review is now underway.  Having virtually no opposition from the Chinese industry in either our Anti-Dumping (AD) or Countervailing Duty (CVD) cases, we have withdrawn most of our efforts.  Instead, we will be focus on individual Chinese exporters whose duties we think we can cause to be increased.  This is an efficient use of our resources and similar to the strategy we’ve deployed in recent administrative reviews.  As a result, we expect the base rates to stay the same, which are approximately 86% for the AD case…

The Rising Threat of Aluminum Extrusion Imports

I want to thank everyone who attended our breakout session about the rising threat from imported aluminum extrusions.  In that session we examined the data in this matter.  There has been clear growth in imports from a variety of countries. In recent years we’ve seen higher market penetration from Vietnam and Malaysia, but now, we see the threat from the Caribbean and other Southeast Asian countries.  As discussed in the meeting, the AEC’s law firm in our China case, Wiley Rein, is collecting data from AEC members in order to track these imports and the impacts on our businesses and industry.  If you’d like to participate in this data collection, please contact me for details.
While I can’t comment in this forum on about our next steps, let me assure you that we are acting.Imports from the Dominican Republic are particularly worrisome.The Chinese owned and operated facility in that country appear to signal a new tactic by the Chinese industry.By investing in third party countries to …

Fair Trade Update

This month we will cover the latest developments in open matters within our case.Appeals and scope requests dominated our attention.
Three appeals were filed this month.The first is the Perfectus/Pallet case.Perfectus has appealed their loss at the Court of International Trade (CIT).We will work with the government in this matter to secure victory at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.In the Tai-Ao 5050 case, the CIT sided with the Department of Commerce (DOC) in their decision that 5050 alloys are covered by our orders.Now Tai-Ao has appealed this decision to the CAFC.We will work with the government on this case as well.Finally, the CIT is asking the CAFC to reject Jangho’s case.In light of the losses suffered by Yulanda in their scope cases, the CIT is asking the CAFC not to waste its time on this pointless appeal.I will keep you posted on these important cases.
We’ve also had some new scope challenges this month.Scaffsales, who sells scaffolding, stadium s…