Skip to main content

Fair Trade Update: 5-Year Sunset Review Timeline

If you weren’t in San Antonio last month for our special Fair Trade meeting and our impromptu Town Hall meeting, then you missed the most informative and impactful live discussions we’ve had in many years.  During those sessions we covered everything from the curtain wall case to China 2016.  The announcement from the Department of Commerce (DOC) that they were launching a circumvention case against China Zhongwang and the Chinese aluminum extruders for using the so-called 5050 alloy added a fiery backdrop to our dialogue.

This year is pivotal for our case.  In a matter of weeks we will learn from the International Trade Commission (ITC) and the DOC whether they will want a full Sunset Review or not in this, the five-year anniversary of the trade orders.  We anticipate that it will be a full review, and we are preparing for that eventuality.  While confidence is high that we will be granted another five years, we cannot take that for granted.  Our first order of business is to collect industry data very quickly and get it to our attorneys at Wiley Rein.  Here is a summary of the timeline:

  • DOC and ITC will publish their initiation notices on or around April 1, 2016
  • We will have 30 days after the publication of the notice of initiation (approximately May 1) by which to file our substantive responses
  • If the DOC conducts a full sunset review, we can expect its preliminary determination to be issued around July 20 and its final determination to be issued around the end of November (and possibly as late as the end of February 2017)

If a full sunset review is conducted on the ITC side, we can expect a final determination around the end of March 2017. In such a case, the industry will need to prepare to submit additional questionnaire responses and engage in a full briefing and hearing schedule, which the ITC will publish when we get closer to those events.

Now, let’s go back to the circumvention case.  I believe we are entering the beginning of the end-game on the 5000-series alloy issue. After waiting for two-plus years to learn if the DOC would call these extrusions ‘in scope’, we finally got our decision.  The DOC determined that 5050 alloy was out of scope, but they immediately launched the circumvention investigation we asked for against Zhongwang last October.  What we were especially pleased to learn was that the DOC has agreed to not only investigate Zhongwang, but also all exporters and importers of the alloy.  This gives us a chance of settling this once and for all.

Members also learned the story behind the Court of International Trade’s recent decision to remand the DOC on their decision in the curtain wall case.  We learned what lies ahead in that regard, the timeline, and the legal strategy.  I won’t discuss that further in this forum, but I am happy to take your calls on the matter.

Likewise, we learned more about the status of our scope clarification/circumvention petition regarding the supposed aluminum pallets.  I won’t go into details here, but attendees were briefed on our strategy moving forward.

For now, the key issue is to submit your data to Wiley Rein.  There will be more to follow, so stay tuned.  And again, without your continued support, none of this would be happening.


  1. I’m really amazed with your posting skills as well as with the layout on your blog site. Is this a paid style or did you modify it yourself? Either way keep up the pleasant quality writing, it is rare to see a great site such as this one these days.I recently came to know about, their Aluminum Extrusion are very effective.
    Aluminum Extrusion


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fair Trade Update: Curtain Wall, Door Thresholds & Vietnam

Well, our year is off and running with a bang. Scope issues, Administrative Review, and circumvention top our list in early 2018.

This month we learned that there will be an appeal in the curtain wall scope case.  Permasteelisa and Jangho filed a notice of appeal last week.  It is expected that Yuanda will almost surely file their own notice of appeal by the deadline, which is February 12. The Chinese industry signaled that they would appeal in a recent article in US Glass magazine.   

Additionally, our scope challenge related to door thresholds continues to move forward.  This is a significant case because door thresholds are expressly mentioned as subject merchandise in our trade orders.  So, to lose this application could open the door to many applications clearly covered by our case.  Finally, we continue to await the judges’ (there are more than one judge at the CIT) decision in the appliance handles cases we defended last fall.  We believe we will win.  However, we are mostly i…

WOW! Did he say ‘Billion’?

The biggest news to hit the trade case came last month.  The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a complaint against Perfectus seeking $1.5 Billion in unpaid duties for the fake pallets exported to the United States.  The DOJ didn’t pull any punches in their submission.  From the complaint, the DOJ stated, “Zhongtian Liu, a Chinese national, is the founder and chairman of China Zhongwang, one of the world’s largest industrial aluminum extrusion companies. Zhongtian Liu controls and is effectively the owner of Perfectus Aluminum, Inc. (“Perfectus”).  Between 2011 and at least 2014, Zhongtian Liu used Perfectus to illegally import more than 2.1 million aluminum “pallets” from China into the United States, as described in detail below.2 The “pallets” were manufactured by China Zhongwang and/or its affiliates and “sold” to Perfectus by several intermediary entities, including Dalian Liwang Trade Co., Ltd., Zhongwang Investment Group, and Yingkou Quianxiang Trading. Many of these intermediar…

Heating Up & Settling Down: The Dichotomy of our Trade Case

The agenda for our trade case continues to be driven by transshipment/circumvention issues and the 232 Investigation.  Meanwhile, our ‘base case’ is so quiet that we’ve been able to free up budget dollars from the Administrative Review to finance our circumvention case against Vietnam.

The Administrative Review is now complete.  The final rates determined by the Department of Commerce are 86% for countervailing duty (CVD) and 16% for anti-dumping duty (AD).  The total of 102% is our highest rate since we first filed the case.

Scope issues have calmed down a lot.  In fact, only the curtain wall case, the appliance handles case, and door threshold cases are on the front burner.  Reports from the hearing for the curtain wall case were very positive.  The attorney leading that effort, David Spooner, is quite confident we will win this round.  Of course, we fully expect another appeal from the Chinese.  We are awaiting the decision from the judge in the appliance handle cases and believe w…