Skip to main content

The Calm Before the Storm

Over the last 3 to 5 weeks, much of our activity in the China trade case has been behind the scenes.  Our Sunset Review filings are being finalized and delivered.  The 4th Administrative Review is a few weeks from a preliminary decision, and work on the scope requests is being conducted by our attorneys and the Department of Commerce (DOC).  However, this quiet work will come to its completion in the coming weeks and will either bring us lots of good news that translates into a resolution of many open issues, or put us in a position where we must restart the battles on many, if not all, fronts.

The most important determiner of our future is whether or not the International Trade Commission will call for a full or abbreviated Sunset Review.  The DOC has already ruled they are okay with a partial review.  We will know in a few weeks.

Next is how the Administrative Review unwinds this year.  Most of the major issues we’ve historically faced have been settled in prior reviews.  So, this process, which appears to be evolving into a routine activity, has few surprises in store for us.  We aim to maintain the gains we won last year when the combined rate ran up to the 80-108% range, depending on exporter.
Lastly, it comes down to the curtain wall scope issue.  We expect an appeal from the Curtain Wall Coalition and the DOC by the end of the year.  Until a decision on the Zhongwang pallets and 5000-series alloy extrusions we will be on pause awaiting the outcome. It will be a few weeks until we hear back on these issues.  The DOC is investigating and has up to 150 days to make a preliminary decision.

So, it was a great time to take a bit of a break from the case and enjoy a wonderful ET 2016 event.  If you were there, you saw the fantastic educational offerings, exhibit hall, and great networking.  While China trade was on the mind of a few, most were really fixated on the growth our industry has witnessed and how impressed we all were that we have come together as an industry to become better extruders so we can capture the many new applications being developed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fair Trade Update: Curtain Wall, Door Thresholds & Vietnam

Well, our year is off and running with a bang. Scope issues, Administrative Review, and circumvention top our list in early 2018.

This month we learned that there will be an appeal in the curtain wall scope case.  Permasteelisa and Jangho filed a notice of appeal last week.  It is expected that Yuanda will almost surely file their own notice of appeal by the deadline, which is February 12. The Chinese industry signaled that they would appeal in a recent article in US Glass magazine.   

Additionally, our scope challenge related to door thresholds continues to move forward.  This is a significant case because door thresholds are expressly mentioned as subject merchandise in our trade orders.  So, to lose this application could open the door to many applications clearly covered by our case.  Finally, we continue to await the judges’ (there are more than one judge at the CIT) decision in the appliance handles cases we defended last fall.  We believe we will win.  However, we are mostly i…

AEC Duties Unchanged; “Trumponomics” Impacts Extruders

Our 6th Annual Administrative Review results have been announced.  As previously reported, the Department of Commerce (DOC) maintained extrusion tariffs at 86.01% for our subsidy, or countervailing duty (CVD), case and 20% for our anti-dumping (AD) case.  The combined duty of 106% has been stable since 2016.  This is a good number for the industry, which continues to contain Chinese aluminum extrusion at less than 1% market share. Furthermore, the DOC also assigned the Adverse Facts Available (AFA) rate of 198.61% to the two mandatory respondents, Liaoning Zhongwang Group Co., Ltd. and Liaoyang Zhongwang Aluminum Profile Co. Ltd., which has been the AFA rate since the 5th review.  The 7th Annual Administrative Review has begun with the selection of mandatory respondents. 

Elsewhere in our case, there is nothing new to report on the scope issues we are battling.  We continue to wait for court dates or decisions depending on the matter.  Our trade enforcement actions and results have ma…

Our China Trade Case – Remember That?

It’s sometimes hard to remember that the AEC has a trade case against China.  With all of the news regarding the 232 Investigation, the Russian Sanctions, and the fallout we’ve experienced, I find myself having to leave tasks on my calendar to be sure I am dialed into the ins and outs of our anti-dumping/countervailing duties (AD/CVD) cases.  When I do review the cases and get dialed in again, I am quite happy with how it’s going.

That’s because our initiatives are starting to gain traction.  Take, for example, our Vietnam Circumvention case.  The deadline for filing briefs in this matter has come and gone with no reply from the other side.  Therefore, we are in a strong position to ask the Department of Commerce for their preliminary ruling so that duties can be applied at once.  The final ruling in this matter is due December 24, 2018.  However, the sooner we can get to a preliminary decision, the better for our domestic industry.  There will be more to come on this in the coming we…