Skip to main content

The Defense of our Orders

For months now I’ve reported that the center of the universe for our Chinese aluminum extrusion tariff orders has moved from being petitioners, to fighting through an unprecedented number of scope issues, to now, defending our orders.  To that end we have a number of issues still on the table and still unresolved.  We are now well over a year since we petitioned the Department of Commerce (DOC) to do something about the fake pallets and 5000-series alloy issue.  During that time we have visited with the DOC, sought and received help and political pressure on the DOC from many of our senators, and even put pressure on them through the media.  Finally, late last week we received the preliminary decision from the DOC on the 5050 alloy issue.  Now we wait for the pallet decision.

For some time now we have been taught by the DOC’s lack of responsiveness that the only way to get some movement is to harass our elected officials into berating the DOC.  With the election just days away, at the time this entry was penned, it appears bureaucrats are preparing for their next job instead of focusing on today’s work.  Will we get a different DOC with the change in administrations?  Who knows?  So, in the meantime, we will keep the pressure on them, and if necessary we will make another visit to D.C.!

Recently, the media, and especially the Wall Street Journal, have written a series of articles about ZhongWang and their business affiliates.  This in turn has taken our story to the front pages. This will help us keep our issues alive in D.C. during what could be an uncertain transition in a lame duck session.

I thought I would use this month’s report to update everyone on a few questions I’ve been asked.

  1. Has the AEC taken a position on ZhongWang’s purchase of Aleris? The answer is, ‘yes’. The AEC has filed a brief in opposition to this purchase.
  2. What are the current duty rates?  The answer is 106%.  Now that may vary depending on the company.  However, for a straight up importer of extrusions they will most likely pay 106%.  That breaks down into 80% antidumping duty and 26% countervailing duty.  We will get a final decision from the DOC this December on whether or not they will stay with that rate.
  3. What are our chances of winning the Sunset Review?  Since no one is opposing our base orders, it appears the orders will be renewed.  However, we will have to make the case for this, even though there may be no opposition.  We will have ‘like product’ challenges that include appliance handles, heat sinks, and heat exchangers.  This means that representatives of these products will try to convince the International Trade Commission that their products are so different from extrusions that they must be excluded.  On these issues we feel confident we will have a winning case.
  4. What is the AEC doing to help preserve a domestic aluminum supply?  This is a tough one.  Right now, Century Aluminum is leading the charge to do just this.  They have developed a strong case that they are attempting to persuade the United States Trade Representative’s office to take to the World Trade Organization.  We have supported this effort in every way possible.  The AEC believes that the Century case will not only force the Chinese to stop the over-production of aluminum, but expose the systemic issues within Chinese policies that drive this type of behavior.  Furthermore, we have supported the efforts of the Manufacturers for Trade Enforcement.  This group is working hard on a diplomatic solution.  Our view here is that in the end, the solution will be found through negotiations, but it may take a trade case at the WTO to make that happen.
  5. Is it true that you are being sued by Aluminum Shapes?  Yes, it is true.  I have been sued personally by Aluminum Shapes.  As you can appreciate, I won’t comment publicly about the case.  However, I want the members to know that I am innocent and well prepared to defend myself.  This in no way will impact my resolve or determination to make our marketplace a free and fair trade environment.  

So, here we are, fighting for the survival of our industry while our Industry Promotion teams work hard to create a larger demand for our products and our Business Excellence teams are making us better extruders.  That is our strategy in motion.  It is a fight, but as they say, “It’s not the size of the dog in the fight; it’s the size of the fight in the dog that matters.”  The AEC has shown the world that this dog has a lot of fight; we know it, and we, will win as a result of it.


Popular posts from this blog

Several Key Issues in Play

As we head into December there are several key issues in play.

Sunset Review Wiley Rein has gathered information from the industry and is quickly converting that into a filing for our case.  They have told me that we had a good representation of the industry in the data collected.

Remaining Timeline January 10, 2017Prehearing Report Issued
January 18, 2017 Prehearing Briefs
January 19, 2017 Request to appear at Hearing
January 25, 2017 Prehearing Conference
January 26, 2017 Hearing
February 6, 2017 Post-Hearing Briefs
February 23, 2017 Report to the Commission (APO Release)
March 1, 2017         APO Release
March 3, 2017         Final Comments
March 10, 2017         Commission Vote
March 27, 2017         Determination Expected

Administrative Review We received the DOC’s final determination in this year’s Administrative Review.  As expected, Commerce found that Chinese producers dumped aluminum extrusions in the U.S. market during the period of review (May 2014-April 2015) in margins r…

Chinese Extrusion Transshipments through Vietnam

In recent months there have been a growing number of reports about aluminum extrusions being imported into the United States from Vietnam.  This recent spike comes at a time when the AEC is watching such reports and import data very carefully.  Given the current policies of the Government of China to export their way out of their self-created overcapacity problems, the AEC is becoming more concerned about the prospect of transshipments from Chinese extruders through Vietnam.

AEC members are asked to contact Jeff Henderson with any reports gathered from the field regarding Vietnamese extrusions coming into the U.S.  All reports will be treated in strict confidence.  It must be determined whether or not there is a pattern in what is being imported.  This pattern could appear in end use markets being targeted, names of the companies exporting product from Vietnam, types of extrusions and finishing, etc.

So, please let Jeff know what you are seeing in the field.  He can be reached at 847.…

Special Report: Details Behind the China Zhongwang Case Filing

As noted in our post from October 23, the Aluminum Extruders Council filed a Circumvention and Scope Clarification case against China Zhongwang (ZW).  Mounting evidence from private investigators, testimony from former employees, data from online import and export databases, and anecdotal evidence from a variety of reporters and other sources made it quite clear that ZW has consistently and systematically been exporting aluminum extrusions that are simply welded together into what are essentially aluminum slabs.  While they claim these so-called ‘deep-processed’ extrusions are aluminum pallets, there is no evidence that ZW or any of its U.S. based operations market such a product.  It is simply incomprehensible that a company would export hundreds of millions of pounds of these extrusions into the U.S. without even marketing them.

The feedback we’ve received so far indicate that ZW intends to do with these extrusions what they have done in Mexico and Vietnam with similar schemes: sen…