Skip to main content

Aluminum in the Spotlight

On April 26, 2017, the Secretary of Commerce (“Secretary”) initiated an investigation to determine the effects of aluminum imports on national security under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (“Section 232”).  On April 27, President Trump signed a memorandum directing Secretary Ross to proceed expeditiously in conducting this investigation.  The President further directed that if the Secretary finds that aluminum is being imported into the United States in such quantities or under such circumstances to threaten U.S. national security, he must recommend actions and steps to “adjust” aluminum imports accordingly.  This has become the central point of discussion throughout the industry.  You can read more about it in my comments on the 232 Investigation this month in the June issue AEC's member newsletter essentiALs (you will need to log in as a member to view it). For now, let’s discuss our case and its latest developments.

With the Sunset Review clearly in our rear-view mirror, we turn our attention to three main issues that are still unresolved.  First, we await word from the Department of Commerce (DOC) concerning our circumvention case against Zhongwang and other exporters of these so-called 5050 alloy aluminum extrusions.  Earlier this year, in its preliminary ruling, the DOC ruled that 5050 extrusions were covered by our orders and declared the import of such products a circumvention scheme.  Since that ruling was announced, more importer/exporters of these extrusions have come forward to rebut the DOC’s decision.  We believe we have successfully addressed those issues and expect the DOC to stand by their preliminary decision.  However, as an industry we should brace ourselves for an appeal, which is likely to come.

Next, the pallet case is nearing its final decision date.  We expect that decision later this month.  Around the first of the year, the DOC decided the pallets in question that are made of 1000-series alloyed extrusions are subject to duties.  In that decision, the DOC opened the door for another submission if other alloys are being used.  We did learn that pallets are also made from 6000-series alloyed aluminum extrusions.  So, we re-filed the case.  There has been some rebuttal to our petition, but again, we believe we have successfully dealt with those arguments.  Furthermore, keep in mind that Customs seized a reported $25 million worth of these pallets as they await the DOC’s decision.

Finally, the 5th Administrative Review is at its mid-point in the process.  So, the DOC announced its preliminary decision for AD and CVD rates.  The new AD rates are proposed to 86% and the new CVD rates are 16%.  The new combined total of 102% is a big improvement from the 40-45% range we have seen in recent years.

As you can see, our base case is poised to close a few open issues and we are in a position to deal with trade enforcement issues.  We may have a shot with the 232 Investigation to get there sooner. Regardless, it is certainly the next big thing to tackle.

In summary, things are going well for us and our case.  The duties appear to be on the increase, we’ve won the preliminary decisions on our key challenges, and we won our Sunset Review.  With your continued support, we can keep the momentum!


Popular posts from this blog

Fair Trade Update: Curtain Wall, Door Thresholds & Vietnam

Well, our year is off and running with a bang. Scope issues, Administrative Review, and circumvention top our list in early 2018.

This month we learned that there will be an appeal in the curtain wall scope case.  Permasteelisa and Jangho filed a notice of appeal last week.  It is expected that Yuanda will almost surely file their own notice of appeal by the deadline, which is February 12. The Chinese industry signaled that they would appeal in a recent article in US Glass magazine.   

Additionally, our scope challenge related to door thresholds continues to move forward.  This is a significant case because door thresholds are expressly mentioned as subject merchandise in our trade orders.  So, to lose this application could open the door to many applications clearly covered by our case.  Finally, we continue to await the judges’ (there are more than one judge at the CIT) decision in the appliance handles cases we defended last fall.  We believe we will win.  However, we are mostly i…

WOW! Did he say ‘Billion’?

The biggest news to hit the trade case came last month.  The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a complaint against Perfectus seeking $1.5 Billion in unpaid duties for the fake pallets exported to the United States.  The DOJ didn’t pull any punches in their submission.  From the complaint, the DOJ stated, “Zhongtian Liu, a Chinese national, is the founder and chairman of China Zhongwang, one of the world’s largest industrial aluminum extrusion companies. Zhongtian Liu controls and is effectively the owner of Perfectus Aluminum, Inc. (“Perfectus”).  Between 2011 and at least 2014, Zhongtian Liu used Perfectus to illegally import more than 2.1 million aluminum “pallets” from China into the United States, as described in detail below.2 The “pallets” were manufactured by China Zhongwang and/or its affiliates and “sold” to Perfectus by several intermediary entities, including Dalian Liwang Trade Co., Ltd., Zhongwang Investment Group, and Yingkou Quianxiang Trading. Many of these intermediar…

Heating Up & Settling Down: The Dichotomy of our Trade Case

The agenda for our trade case continues to be driven by transshipment/circumvention issues and the 232 Investigation.  Meanwhile, our ‘base case’ is so quiet that we’ve been able to free up budget dollars from the Administrative Review to finance our circumvention case against Vietnam.

The Administrative Review is now complete.  The final rates determined by the Department of Commerce are 86% for countervailing duty (CVD) and 16% for anti-dumping duty (AD).  The total of 102% is our highest rate since we first filed the case.

Scope issues have calmed down a lot.  In fact, only the curtain wall case, the appliance handles case, and door threshold cases are on the front burner.  Reports from the hearing for the curtain wall case were very positive.  The attorney leading that effort, David Spooner, is quite confident we will win this round.  Of course, we fully expect another appeal from the Chinese.  We are awaiting the decision from the judge in the appliance handle cases and believe w…