Skip to main content

Fair Trade Update: Curtain Wall, Door Thresholds & Vietnam

Well, our year is off and running with a bang. Scope issues, Administrative Review, and circumvention top our list in early 2018.

This month we learned that there will be an appeal in the curtain wall scope case.  Permasteelisa and Jangho filed a notice of appeal last week.  It is expected that Yuanda will almost surely file their own notice of appeal by the deadline, which is February 12. The Chinese industry signaled that they would appeal in a recent article in US Glass magazine.   

Additionally, our scope challenge related to door thresholds continues to move forward.  This is a significant case because door thresholds are expressly mentioned as subject merchandise in our trade orders.  So, to lose this application could open the door to many applications clearly covered by our case.  Finally, we continue to await the judges’ (there are more than one judge at the CIT) decision in the appliance handles cases we defended last fall.  We believe we will win.  However, we are mostly interested to know the basis on which the judges’ rule in our favor.  This could open the door for us to go back to the Department of Commerce (DOC) and ask them to reverse earlier exclusions in key product categories.  So, stay tuned to this one.

The DOC announced its preliminary decision in the Administrative Review in the Anti-Dumping (AD) case.  They announced tariffs would remain at 86%.  This is very good for us, especially in imports from China that are kitted, like curtain wall.  We have not yet seen an announcement from the DOC on the Countervailing Duty (CVD) case.  Hopefully we will have that for you next month.  It currently stands at 20% making our combined rate 106%.

As you would have read in a Trade Alert in January, the AEC did file a circumvention case against Vietnam.  That timeline allows for the DOC to review the petition for 45 days and announce if it will move forward with a full investigation.  We should hear the DOC’s decision later this month.  Therefore, the final decision should occur before the end of 2018.  However, there are many legal maneuvers and DOC actions that could delay both the initial 45 days and the 300 days thereafter.  In the 5000-series and pallet cases, it took almost two years for the final decision. So, we shall see.  The good news is that we got the case filed and it is very strong.

So, even though the 232 Investigation has been the key focus for our industry in recent weeks, it is good to know that we continue to move forward with positive results in the key areas of our trade case against China.  AEC members can read my analysis of the 232 Investigation in this month’s issue of teh AEC member newsletter, essentiALs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

AEC Duties Unchanged; “Trumponomics” Impacts Extruders

Our 6th Annual Administrative Review results have been announced.  As previously reported, the Department of Commerce (DOC) maintained extrusion tariffs at 86.01% for our subsidy, or countervailing duty (CVD), case and 20% for our anti-dumping (AD) case.  The combined duty of 106% has been stable since 2016.  This is a good number for the industry, which continues to contain Chinese aluminum extrusion at less than 1% market share. Furthermore, the DOC also assigned the Adverse Facts Available (AFA) rate of 198.61% to the two mandatory respondents, Liaoning Zhongwang Group Co., Ltd. and Liaoyang Zhongwang Aluminum Profile Co. Ltd., which has been the AFA rate since the 5th review.  The 7th Annual Administrative Review has begun with the selection of mandatory respondents. 

Elsewhere in our case, there is nothing new to report on the scope issues we are battling.  We continue to wait for court dates or decisions depending on the matter.  Our trade enforcement actions and results have ma…

Our China Trade Case – Remember That?

It’s sometimes hard to remember that the AEC has a trade case against China.  With all of the news regarding the 232 Investigation, the Russian Sanctions, and the fallout we’ve experienced, I find myself having to leave tasks on my calendar to be sure I am dialed into the ins and outs of our anti-dumping/countervailing duties (AD/CVD) cases.  When I do review the cases and get dialed in again, I am quite happy with how it’s going.

That’s because our initiatives are starting to gain traction.  Take, for example, our Vietnam Circumvention case.  The deadline for filing briefs in this matter has come and gone with no reply from the other side.  Therefore, we are in a strong position to ask the Department of Commerce for their preliminary ruling so that duties can be applied at once.  The final ruling in this matter is due December 24, 2018.  However, the sooner we can get to a preliminary decision, the better for our domestic industry.  There will be more to come on this in the coming we…