Skip to main content

Trump Not Interested in ‘Saving’ the Aluminum Market & Cheaters BEWARE!

On Thursday, May 31, President Trump announced that he is “taking action to protect America’s national security from the effects of global oversupply of steel and aluminum” by imposing a 10% tariff on aluminum imports from some of our strongest allies and aluminum industry partners: Canada, Mexico and the European Union.  The implementation of these tariffs follows “extensive discussions and a months-long process” after the initial proclamations in March. In an article posted on, the statement notes that “[the] President made it clear that the Administration was willing to work with those countries to find separate arrangements that would meet the national security requirements of the United States.” The statement goes on to read, “Current quantities and circumstances of steel and aluminum imports into the United States threaten to impair national security. These excessive imports are driven in large part by the worldwide glut from overproduction by other countries.”

Really?! So, Trump is going to punish our allies, hurt the American economy and threaten American jobs while China gets a pass.

Once again, the administration is proving it has no ambitions to ‘save’ the aluminum market.  While the domestic market is silent about the supposed ‘ramp up’ of domestic production, our government pushes forward with policies that continue to isolate our market and drive prices disproportionately higher versus the rest of the world.  Trump’s announcement to include the E.U., Canada, and Mexico to countries on which he will place a 10% tariff demonstrates how out of step he is to our industry’s needs and threats.  While the entire U.S. aluminum industry has screamed that China is the sole threat to our industry, the administration decides to bail out ZTE.  The only silver lining is that he did NOT choose to enact quotas…yet. 

In other news…

Cheaters BEWARE!
I trust you have seen the recent flurry of trade enforcement activity from the AEC in recent weeks.  These results are the due to the renewed focus the AEC’s Fair Trade Committee has had on trade enforcement issues.  It has been tough at times to maintain that focus with all of the noise out of Washington D.C., which we’ll discuss later, but nevertheless, the Committee has continued to push enforcement in the background.

Our first announcement came with the Vietnamese Circumvention case.  Now that case has moved past a preliminary decision and into the full investigation.  In the preliminary decision, Commerce found good cause for the case and has extended duties to Vietnamese exports to the U.S.  Those shipments will be subject to the same duties as our China case.  We expect this to hold up in the final determination, which should be announced by the end of this year.

Next, you saw the announcement that the AEC submitted its first-ever transshipment case to the new Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) program.  This case involved shippers from Malaysia that simply relabeled Chinese extrusions and shipped them to the U.S.  We started working on this case last fall.  It came from a referral from the International Fair Trade Alliance.  So, our recent announcement informed everyone that EAPA has made its preliminary decision and will begin to impose duties on imports from those companies.  We can’t know for certain, but typically the investigation will extend to those in the U.S. that ultimately bought the extrusions.  In the False Claims Act in Florida a few years ago, the manufacturers that ultimately used those extrusions had to pay back duties and fines.  We will have to wait and see how this one settles.

Shortly after our filing, there was another case brought to EAPA regarding door thresholds.  As you should know, there is an active scope challenge underway about door thresholds.  So, the timing of this claim and EAPA’s decision to move forward with that investigation gave us a one-two punch.
All I can say publicly at this point is that there will be more!  So, continue to let me know of any cases you are seeing in the field.  The AEC has expanded its toolbox, and may be able to help.

The other elements of our case have moved along well.  We still await the preliminary results for this year’s administrative review, but expect the rates to stay at 86% AD and 20% CVD.  We did get the court decision on the two appliance handle cases.  One of them was a big win for us, the other, not so much.  However, we will be filing a motion with the second case as the final decision was full of contradictions.  The importance of this is that we would like strong language from the courts that could allow us to go back and fight for some applications we previously lost.

Elsewhere, the industry seems to be normalizing the ongoing chaos from the Russian Sanctions and the 232 Investigation.  News reports suggest RUSAL is working hard to get out from underneath the Russian Oligarch.  If successful, I believe there will be a large sigh of relief from the industry.  While some extruders may be in a stronger position because they didn’t use RUSAL, the long term implications of RUSAL being unable to ship into the U.S. appears to be problematic.  Others disagree, and believe metal units will flow to the U.S. to cover the gap, and RUSAL will backfill the needs of the countries that lose units to the U.S.  Time will tell.

However, the 232 Investigation seems to have no end in sight.  Each month, the President will be deciding whether or not to extend any exclusion.  If he doesn’t, he is ‘offering’ tariffs or quotas.  For the most part, the industry seems to have reconciled itself to the 10% tariffs.  That is not the case with quotas.  On this point, the AEC will continue to speak out against any attempts to restrict growth for our industry.  The most recent Aluminum Association reports show a near 10% growth in shipments for our industry this year to date over 2017.  We need the metal to keep this growth on track! In the short run, the greatest threat to us doing that is access to metal!  If you have a story to tell on this matter, please let me know.  Those ‘proof points’ are being heard in D.C.!

In summary, please let HQ know of trade enforcement issues you find in the field.  We are better equipped now to handle them, and have a government agency looking to help us.  Also, keep me informed on metal issues.  When I am in D.C. or fielding calls from the media, it helps our story to have real life examples.

As always, thank you for your continued support!


Popular posts from this blog

AEC Duties Unchanged; “Trumponomics” Impacts Extruders

Our 6th Annual Administrative Review results have been announced.  As previously reported, the Department of Commerce (DOC) maintained extrusion tariffs at 86.01% for our subsidy, or countervailing duty (CVD), case and 20% for our anti-dumping (AD) case.  The combined duty of 106% has been stable since 2016.  This is a good number for the industry, which continues to contain Chinese aluminum extrusion at less than 1% market share. Furthermore, the DOC also assigned the Adverse Facts Available (AFA) rate of 198.61% to the two mandatory respondents, Liaoning Zhongwang Group Co., Ltd. and Liaoyang Zhongwang Aluminum Profile Co. Ltd., which has been the AFA rate since the 5th review.  The 7th Annual Administrative Review has begun with the selection of mandatory respondents. 

Elsewhere in our case, there is nothing new to report on the scope issues we are battling.  We continue to wait for court dates or decisions depending on the matter.  Our trade enforcement actions and results have ma…

Great News! The 5050 Appeal has been Won!

Since the industry won its 5050 alloy circumvention case, extruders across the country saw a return of orders from customers that went that direction.  With this case on appeal, there were legitimate concerns that all of this would be reversed.  However, the Department of Commerce (DOC) won its case at the Court of International Trade (CIT), and the industry is spared another round of disruption.  This is good news, indeed!

This win comes on the heels of our victory in the Vietnam circumvention case.  Since that preliminary decision was made, Vietnam has placed duties on Chinese imports.  We believe this in response to our circumvention case as reported here.

Also noteworthy: on May 1, 2019, the Department initiated anti-circumvention inquiries to determine whether imports of aluminum jalousie shutters that are processed in the Dominican Republic from window frame extrusions produced in China are circumventing the Orders. The Department also self-initiated a scope inquiry to determine…

Work Focuses on Scope Challenges and Imports

This month our Fair Trade focus has shifted back to scope challenges.  At the same time, other issues are developing, which I will touch on in this report.  However, the key decision this month actually came from an adversary.  Whirlpool has dismissed its appeal in the appliance handle case.  This is a great development for us, as we have one less opponent in our quest to push the Department of Commerce (DOC) to return the interpretation of our scope back to the original language and its intent.  This decision from the courts confirms that the DOC cannot rule an item out of scope simply because it has additional non-extruded components.  It also reinforces the principle that a part cannot be ruled out of scope if it is a subassembly of a larger product.  These two issues are the legal pillars that will enhance our ability to keep more applications covered by our orders, and possibly seek a reversal from the DOC on items previously ruled out of scope.

One of those product categories in…