Skip to main content

AEC Duties Unchanged; “Trumponomics” Impacts Extruders

Our 6th Annual Administrative Review results have been announced.  As previously reported, the Department of Commerce (DOC) maintained extrusion tariffs at 86.01% for our subsidy, or countervailing duty (CVD), case and 20% for our anti-dumping (AD) case.  The combined duty of 106% has been stable since 2016.  This is a good number for the industry, which continues to contain Chinese aluminum extrusion at less than 1% market share. Furthermore, the DOC also assigned the Adverse Facts Available (AFA) rate of 198.61% to the two mandatory respondents, Liaoning Zhongwang Group Co., Ltd. and Liaoyang Zhongwang Aluminum Profile Co. Ltd., which has been the AFA rate since the 5th review.  The 7th Annual Administrative Review has begun with the selection of mandatory respondents. 

Elsewhere in our case, there is nothing new to report on the scope issues we are battling.  We continue to wait for court dates or decisions depending on the matter.  Our trade enforcement actions and results have made their way into Customs’ pipeline.  It appears we may have caught another importer in violation of the orders, which will be the fourth this year. 

Related to enforcement issues, I am excited that at this year’s fall Management Conference we will have Carrie Owens, Director of Enforcement Operations for U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Trade Remedy Law Enforcement Directorate speaking to us about the Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) program we have used for these cases.  Furthermore, Ms. Owens’ colleague, Marisa Hill, Supervisory International Trade Analyst for CPB will be presenting in one of our breakout workshops.  She will teach us how to file an e-allegation.  If you suspect trade violations, then you MUST attend this session!

Extruders and suppliers continue to adapt to the new rules initiated by the Trump administration.  For the 232, exclusion requests continue to be presented to the administration.  You can find a list of exclusion decisions here.  At this stage of this emerging trade war, there is no indication that the administration is willing, or even considering, reversing the 232 orders.  Instead, the focus has shifted to Trump’s 301 Trade Orders aimed at China.  At this time, the President is considering a 25% tariff, which he raised from 10%, on $200 billion worth of Chinese imports.  There is also a proposal for a tariff on $500 billion worth of Chinese imports.  It is not clear yet if that proposal will be at 10% or 25%.  Regardless, the point of the measure is clear.  Trump is hitting China hard in an effort to force the Chinese to be fair trading partners.  However, it is not clear exactly where and in which industries he seeks their reform.  The AEC has been engaged on this issue and will continue to track its ebb and flow.  The AEC has reviewed the list of imported products being suggested by the administration.  We have made requests to have specific downstream items added to the list.  Lastly, the industry awaits the administration’s decision on how it will handle RUSAL when it makes its determination on the Russian Sanctions.  Most industry experts I talked with believe RUSAL will be excluded and allowed to re-enter the U.S. market.  For some extruders this will be much-needed good news.

Fair Trade and the Trump agenda will be key issues for discussion during the Management Conference, scheduled for September 11-13 in Chicago.  We will be covering all the bases from the General Sessions to the Breakout Sessions.  I very much encourage AEC members to attend!  See you there!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Victories and Struggles: Our Mission Persists

 On December 3, 2024, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) took action in issuing a forced labor finding against Kingtom Aluminio S.R.L. (“Kingtom”).  This victory for U.S. extruders is a culmination of years of effort between the AEC and United Steel Workers (USW), which started with the initial Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) allegation filed in 2019.  As a result of this finding, CBP has authorized all port directors to seize imports of aluminum extrusions from Kingtom.   For almost 15 years the Aluminum Extrusion Fair Trade Committee (AEFTC) has worked on a wide variety of trade activities.  In defending the China I case, the AEFTC has navigated the 232 Tariffs and has worked with other organizations on EAPA allegations, along with circumvention and transshipment issues.  Thank you to all who have contributed time and resources over the years!  However, there will be more work to do.  With a new administration and 2025 fast approa...

Section 232 Implications: Get the Latest

 Recently, the AEC released a detailed fact sheet outlining the implications of Section 232 tariffs on aluminum imports, available for review on our website here. This document underscores our ongoing commitment to transparency and informed decision-making within our member base. Previously, we updated the 232 Derivative Products List to include a comprehensive breakdown of HTSUS codes and product descriptions, aimed at providing clarity for our stakeholders accessible here . Additionally, The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) within the Department of Commerce established a formal process for the addition of aluminum products designated the USHTS codes. The first window for submission opened on May 1, 2025, and closed on May 15, 2025. After the posting and public comment period occurs the BIS will make a final determination within 60 days. In addition to these regulatory updates, the Trump Administratio...

The 232 Takes Center Stage

The 232 exclusion requests, objections, rebuttals and surrebuttals process continues with the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC).  Since the exclusion process on aluminum extrusions restarted in June, AEC members have logged more than 500 objections and over 40 surrebuttals with the DOC.  While there have been a few very specific exclusion requests (i.e., hard alloy, seamless tube, etc.), objections have been limited to only one producing company.  As an industry, we have mounted a stellar defense with all exclusion requests receiving three or more objections from member companies.  At this point, there have yet to be any exclusion requests to make it to the final determination and we are hoping to have the first round of results to share at the Fall Management Conference .  However, if we do start to receive results before mid-September, we will make sure to communicate results as they are made available.  The number of 232 exclusion requests greatly decrea...