Skip to main content

AEC Duties Unchanged; “Trumponomics” Impacts Extruders

Our 6th Annual Administrative Review results have been announced.  As previously reported, the Department of Commerce (DOC) maintained extrusion tariffs at 86.01% for our subsidy, or countervailing duty (CVD), case and 20% for our anti-dumping (AD) case.  The combined duty of 106% has been stable since 2016.  This is a good number for the industry, which continues to contain Chinese aluminum extrusion at less than 1% market share. Furthermore, the DOC also assigned the Adverse Facts Available (AFA) rate of 198.61% to the two mandatory respondents, Liaoning Zhongwang Group Co., Ltd. and Liaoyang Zhongwang Aluminum Profile Co. Ltd., which has been the AFA rate since the 5th review.  The 7th Annual Administrative Review has begun with the selection of mandatory respondents. 

Elsewhere in our case, there is nothing new to report on the scope issues we are battling.  We continue to wait for court dates or decisions depending on the matter.  Our trade enforcement actions and results have made their way into Customs’ pipeline.  It appears we may have caught another importer in violation of the orders, which will be the fourth this year. 

Related to enforcement issues, I am excited that at this year’s fall Management Conference we will have Carrie Owens, Director of Enforcement Operations for U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Trade Remedy Law Enforcement Directorate speaking to us about the Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) program we have used for these cases.  Furthermore, Ms. Owens’ colleague, Marisa Hill, Supervisory International Trade Analyst for CPB will be presenting in one of our breakout workshops.  She will teach us how to file an e-allegation.  If you suspect trade violations, then you MUST attend this session!

Extruders and suppliers continue to adapt to the new rules initiated by the Trump administration.  For the 232, exclusion requests continue to be presented to the administration.  You can find a list of exclusion decisions here.  At this stage of this emerging trade war, there is no indication that the administration is willing, or even considering, reversing the 232 orders.  Instead, the focus has shifted to Trump’s 301 Trade Orders aimed at China.  At this time, the President is considering a 25% tariff, which he raised from 10%, on $200 billion worth of Chinese imports.  There is also a proposal for a tariff on $500 billion worth of Chinese imports.  It is not clear yet if that proposal will be at 10% or 25%.  Regardless, the point of the measure is clear.  Trump is hitting China hard in an effort to force the Chinese to be fair trading partners.  However, it is not clear exactly where and in which industries he seeks their reform.  The AEC has been engaged on this issue and will continue to track its ebb and flow.  The AEC has reviewed the list of imported products being suggested by the administration.  We have made requests to have specific downstream items added to the list.  Lastly, the industry awaits the administration’s decision on how it will handle RUSAL when it makes its determination on the Russian Sanctions.  Most industry experts I talked with believe RUSAL will be excluded and allowed to re-enter the U.S. market.  For some extruders this will be much-needed good news.

Fair Trade and the Trump agenda will be key issues for discussion during the Management Conference, scheduled for September 11-13 in Chicago.  We will be covering all the bases from the General Sessions to the Breakout Sessions.  I very much encourage AEC members to attend!  See you there!


Popular posts from this blog

Fair Trade Update: Curtain Wall, Door Thresholds & Vietnam

Well, our year is off and running with a bang. Scope issues, Administrative Review, and circumvention top our list in early 2018.

This month we learned that there will be an appeal in the curtain wall scope case.  Permasteelisa and Jangho filed a notice of appeal last week.  It is expected that Yuanda will almost surely file their own notice of appeal by the deadline, which is February 12. The Chinese industry signaled that they would appeal in a recent article in US Glass magazine.   

Additionally, our scope challenge related to door thresholds continues to move forward.  This is a significant case because door thresholds are expressly mentioned as subject merchandise in our trade orders.  So, to lose this application could open the door to many applications clearly covered by our case.  Finally, we continue to await the judges’ (there are more than one judge at the CIT) decision in the appliance handles cases we defended last fall.  We believe we will win.  However, we are mostly i…

Our China Trade Case – Remember That?

It’s sometimes hard to remember that the AEC has a trade case against China.  With all of the news regarding the 232 Investigation, the Russian Sanctions, and the fallout we’ve experienced, I find myself having to leave tasks on my calendar to be sure I am dialed into the ins and outs of our anti-dumping/countervailing duties (AD/CVD) cases.  When I do review the cases and get dialed in again, I am quite happy with how it’s going.

That’s because our initiatives are starting to gain traction.  Take, for example, our Vietnam Circumvention case.  The deadline for filing briefs in this matter has come and gone with no reply from the other side.  Therefore, we are in a strong position to ask the Department of Commerce for their preliminary ruling so that duties can be applied at once.  The final ruling in this matter is due December 24, 2018.  However, the sooner we can get to a preliminary decision, the better for our domestic industry.  There will be more to come on this in the coming we…