Skip to main content

Keeping You in the Loop on AEC Fair Trade Issues

Since my last update, a few issues have been settled, and a couple more are pending.  I’ll use this update to bring you into the loop.  The curtain wall case has a hearing date (finally), our work with the EAPA program has shut down two operations, and the industry awaits a final decision in the RUSAL sanctions issue.  Meanwhile, there is no indication from the administration that they plan to grant Canada and Mexico an exclusion from 232 tariffs.

Curtain wall has been a big issue in the fair trade case in recent months.  The long awaited ‘final’ appeal on the scope decision to keep curtain wall covered by our orders has been set.  The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has scheduled oral argument on the Chinese exporters’ appeal of the Court of International Trade’s ruling that imports of Yuanda’s curtain wall units are subject to unfair trade tariffs on aluminum extrusions.  Oral arguments will be held at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, February 5th at the Court (717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC, Courtroom 203).  Confidence is high that we will once again prevail.  If that happens, the only remaining option for the opposition would be an appeal to the Supreme Court.  Keep in mind the Supreme Court hasn’t ruled on a trade case in many decades.  So, it appears this will conclude the legal fight.  However, we’ve all learned how persistent the Chinese can be in these matters.  So, I leave room for another effort, but it seems to me they can only do that if they introduce a brand new product and start from scratch.  I can’t imagine what that product will be since the decisions that have been made by the Department Commerce and the courts have been very broad.

We continue to be negatively affected by Chinese curtain wall extruders through suspected transshipments, mislabeling, and other circumvention schemes.  The AEC is working now to address that issue.  It is a big one, but we are getting ramped up for the fight.  Having two wins now through the Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA), we are confident Customs will address these complaints.  Any information your company may have in this matter will be helpful.

Later this month the U.S. Government will decide if RUSAL will be excluded from the Russian Sanctions.  The market seems confident this will happen.  The deadline for a decision is January 21, 2019. 

There is a great deal of pressure being put on the administration to exclude Mexico and Canada from the 232 tariffs.  So far, nothing has changed.  The AEC is monitoring the situation and participating as appropriate.

For the AEC, we will continue to focus on fair trade enforcement.  We’ve ramped up our resources and connected ourselves with Customs.  If you have any information about possible duty evasion, please let me know.  I get reports all the time from extruders that have seen business return from customers that were being supplied by these groups.  So, we can stop it!  This is our focus in 2019, and with your help we will get it done!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

AEC Duties Unchanged; “Trumponomics” Impacts Extruders

Our 6th Annual Administrative Review results have been announced.  As previously reported, the Department of Commerce (DOC) maintained extrusion tariffs at 86.01% for our subsidy, or countervailing duty (CVD), case and 20% for our anti-dumping (AD) case.  The combined duty of 106% has been stable since 2016.  This is a good number for the industry, which continues to contain Chinese aluminum extrusion at less than 1% market share. Furthermore, the DOC also assigned the Adverse Facts Available (AFA) rate of 198.61% to the two mandatory respondents, Liaoning Zhongwang Group Co., Ltd. and Liaoyang Zhongwang Aluminum Profile Co. Ltd., which has been the AFA rate since the 5th review.  The 7th Annual Administrative Review has begun with the selection of mandatory respondents. 

Elsewhere in our case, there is nothing new to report on the scope issues we are battling.  We continue to wait for court dates or decisions depending on the matter.  Our trade enforcement actions and results have ma…

Great News! The 5050 Appeal has been Won!

Since the industry won its 5050 alloy circumvention case, extruders across the country saw a return of orders from customers that went that direction.  With this case on appeal, there were legitimate concerns that all of this would be reversed.  However, the Department of Commerce (DOC) won its case at the Court of International Trade (CIT), and the industry is spared another round of disruption.  This is good news, indeed!

This win comes on the heels of our victory in the Vietnam circumvention case.  Since that preliminary decision was made, Vietnam has placed duties on Chinese imports.  We believe this in response to our circumvention case as reported here.

Also noteworthy: on May 1, 2019, the Department initiated anti-circumvention inquiries to determine whether imports of aluminum jalousie shutters that are processed in the Dominican Republic from window frame extrusions produced in China are circumventing the Orders. The Department also self-initiated a scope inquiry to determine…

Work Focuses on Scope Challenges and Imports

This month our Fair Trade focus has shifted back to scope challenges.  At the same time, other issues are developing, which I will touch on in this report.  However, the key decision this month actually came from an adversary.  Whirlpool has dismissed its appeal in the appliance handle case.  This is a great development for us, as we have one less opponent in our quest to push the Department of Commerce (DOC) to return the interpretation of our scope back to the original language and its intent.  This decision from the courts confirms that the DOC cannot rule an item out of scope simply because it has additional non-extruded components.  It also reinforces the principle that a part cannot be ruled out of scope if it is a subassembly of a larger product.  These two issues are the legal pillars that will enhance our ability to keep more applications covered by our orders, and possibly seek a reversal from the DOC on items previously ruled out of scope.

One of those product categories in…