Skip to main content

Fair Trade Update

By

This month we will cover the latest developments in open matters within our case.  Appeals and scope requests dominated our attention.

Three appeals were filed this month.  The first is the Perfectus/Pallet case.  Perfectus has appealed their loss at the Court of International Trade (CIT).  We will work with the government in this matter to secure victory at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.  In the Tai-Ao 5050 case, the CIT sided with the Department of Commerce (DOC) in their decision that 5050 alloys are covered by our orders.  Now Tai-Ao has appealed this decision to the CAFC.  We will work with the government on this case as well.  Finally, the CIT is asking the CAFC to reject Jangho’s case.  In light of the losses suffered by Yulanda in their scope cases, the CIT is asking the CAFC not to waste its time on this pointless appeal.  I will keep you posted on these important cases.

We’ve also had some new scope challenges this month.  Scaffsales, who sells scaffolding, stadium seating, ladders, etc., is asking their imports of these products not be subject to our cases’ duties.  We will oppose this request, since this is exactly the type of work extruders do every day.  AIRpipe has re-filed their scope request regarding certain pipes and fittings.  These look very much like the extrusions the DOC has ruled as subject merchandise in the past.  So, we will oppose this one, as well.

Elsewhere, we expect a final determination in our circumvention case against Vietnam.  As you may recall, the DOC ruled in our favor with their preliminary decision.  So, the expectation is that the final determination will be a win for us.  There is no further news to report on the enforcement front this month.  However, the Fair Trade Committee members have started collecting trade data for legal review to help us track imports coming into the U.S.  Over the last few years, we’ve seen import percentages and volumes climb in the U.S.  SO, we are collecting data to track this in a more granular fashion.  Should further action be necessary, we will be ready to go.  If you are willing and interested in helping us, please contact me at jhenderson@tso.net, and I will get you the template.

Once again, I am pleased to report this good news to you about our case.  Your support and dedication to this case, the AEC, and your industry is impressive.  Thank you!

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 232 Implications: Get the Latest

By
 Recently, the AEC released a detailed fact sheet outlining the implications of Section 232 tariffs on aluminum imports, available for review on our website here. This document underscores our ongoing commitment to transparency and informed decision-making within our member base. Previously, we updated the 232 Derivative Products List to include a comprehensive breakdown of HTSUS codes and product descriptions, aimed at providing clarity for our stakeholders accessible here . Additionally, The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) within the Department of Commerce established a formal process for the addition of aluminum products designated the USHTS codes. The first window for submission opened on May 1, 2025, and closed on May 15, 2025. After the posting and public comment period occurs the BIS will make a final determination within 60 days. In addition to these regulatory updates, the Trump Administratio...
Post a Comment
Read more

Valuation, USMCA, and Fair Trade Priorities

By
 The primary focus of our government affairs work at this moment centers on the Section 232 valuation issue currently under discussion in Washington, D.C.  As highlighted during the recent Aluminum Summit and in prior AEC communications, there remains uncertainty regarding how the Administration intends to resolve this matter. The original Executive Order that established the Section 232 aluminum tariffs made clear that the tariffs were intended to apply to the full value of the imported aluminum extrusion, not solely the value of the aluminum content within the product.  At this time, it remains unclear whether the Administration will seek to address the issue by issuing a new Executive Order or by providing additional interpretive guidance through U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).  The AEC is actively monitoring these discussions and will update members as soon as a definitive course of action emerges. Parallel to the valuation discussions, attention is tur...
Post a Comment
Read more

Adjustments to the 232 Tariffs

By
 On June 3, 2025, an Executive Order (EO) was issued adjusting the Section 232 tariff on aluminum and aluminum derivative products (DPL) from 25% to 50%.  In addition to the adjustment in the 232 tariff, the EO also contains language that adjusts how the 232 tariff is applied. The following is a summary of the key points.  Aluminum and aluminum derivative products within HTS Ch. 76 and outside HTS Ch. 76: the 50% duty applies only to the aluminum content.  Any non-aluminum content in these products will be subject to the reciprocal tariff (currently at 10%).  This is a change from the February 10, 2025, EO for aluminum and aluminum derivative products in HTS Ch. 76 where the 232 tariff was applied to the full value of the product.  With the most recent EO, the 232 tariff now applies only to the aluminum content and the 10% reciprocal tariff applies to the non-aluminum content.  The current EO also changes how the 232 Auto tariffs, 232 aluminum tariffs ...
Post a Comment
Read more