Skip to main content

Another Big Win for the Industry!


The news of our win in the CCM solar mount case was well earned, indeed.  Having lost a solar mount case a few years ago, our ability to prevail this time was enabled by our victory in court in a matter involving kitchen appliance handles.  We worked to get that win in the Meridian/appliance handle case because of the precedent it would set.  That precedent speaks to the core of our scope: fabricated aluminum extrusions that are kitted are subject merchandise, as long as that kit is NOT a final and finished product once assembled.  The last administration took the opinion that subassemblies should be considered a final completed product.  As a result, we lost four key decisions, one of which was solar mounting systems.  The Fair Trade Committee decided that, should we win the Meridian case on the grounds we sought, then we should re-fight these applications as they become available for us to do so.  That is what we did here, and we won!  

We do have a few other updates this month concerning our case and other issues.  With the COVID-19 crisis shutting down Washington D.C. we have seen the Department of Commerce (DOC) pivot into the same ‘work from home’ environment many of us have had to do.  Consequently, some matters are moving quite slowly.

A case in point is the 9th Annual Administrative Review.  While this has become a bit routine for us having been through it every year since 2012, it is still a very important process.  It will adjust and determine the tariffs for the current calendar year and the next.  Over the last few years we have seen duties hold steady at 86% Anti-Dumping (AD) , and 20% Countervailing Duties (CVD).  So, we were happy to see the Anti-Dumping rate stay the same in the 8th administrative review.  The DOC has said they will have their final determination in the CVD case.  However, we expect last year’s duties to hold as well.  Concerning the kickoff of the 9th administrative review, that appears to be delayed by about 50 days.

The Aluminum Association has been working with the administration on a new Aluminum Monitoring System for all imported aluminum products covered by the 232.  This program, somewhat modeled on the steel program, will track the country of origin of the imported product and the primary metal source.  We are providing comments to expand that to billet as well.   Documentation will need to be presented by the importer that reveals this information.  For us, it becomes an additional tool to help find transshipped material.  Additionally, the import data will become public information and updated on a weekly basis.  This will empower us to get closer to ‘real time’ information on incoming shipments.  The DOC and Customs Department are working together on this program, which we hope to see completed and implemented very soon.

Other scope issues were in play last month as well.  On April 27, 2020, we received a new scope ruling request from Centsunergy, a California-based solar panel contractor and importer of aluminum extrusions. The request is for exclusion of two products, both under the finished goods kit exclusion: a “solar gazebo system” and a “solar ground mounted system.” The products are both very vaguely described but include solar panels that are fitted into aluminum frames. Given the recent decision on solar mounts, I expect a strong likelihood of winning, should it get that far.  Elsewhere, we submitted comments on Reflection Window’s resubmitted scope request for window wall system kits under the “finished goods kits” exclusion on March 31, 2020. The Department issued another supplemental questionnaire to Reflection on April 28, 2020.

Circumvention and transshipments are also being monitored.   We are very close to being able to announce some great news concerning illegal shipments into our country.  I am hopeful, and eager, that we can announce that in the coming weeks.

Thank you for your dedication to this case and your understanding of how important it is to our industry.  Great news, like we’ve shared this month, is only possible because of your support!  If you have any questions, concerns, or reports of suspicious activity, please do not hesitate to call.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aluminum Extruders Coalition Files Historic Case; Customs Says “Yes”

Well, in case you missed it, a group of Aluminum Extruders Council members filed a historic AD/CVD case against 15 countries.  All 15 countries will be sued for dumping (AD), and four will be sued for subsidies (CVD).  In a press release issued earlier this week, which you can read here , the countries were identified as well as the projected duties the coalition seeks.  Anyone within the four walls of the Aluminum Extruders Council knew this was coming.  It has been discussed for four years.  To address rising imports, we battled in the enforcement arena, we went hard after products under assault in scope challenges and worked hard on the 232.  After exhausting every available option, and never seeing a dent in the import stats, we were faced with this hard decision.  That is where we are today.  The Hearing will be held later this month, and decisions will start to be rendered in the weeks that follow.  Communications about the details of this case will be handled by the Coalition,

A Nice Win to Start the Year!

 For months you’ve read my blog posts bemoaning the terrible decisions coming out of Washington D.C. related to our case.  Well, with the New Year, we have a fresh start.  And it’s a good one!  The industry has won its first Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) case involving fencing extrusions.  On December 20, 2023, Fortress withdrew its request for an administrative review, prompting U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) to terminate the administrative review entirely. Termination of the review makes the CBP’s affirmative determination of evasion final.  When terminating the review, CBP clarified that termination does not in any way preclude CBP or other agencies from pursuing additional enforcement actions against Fortress or imposing penalties should the need arise. The other EAPA fencing case is pending, and it appears the respondent is not participating.  We submitted voluntary factual information and the company in question did not submit written arguments by the November 6, 202

USITC Issues 332 to Assess Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Where Sustainability Meets Trade Policy

  The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) is undertaking a new factfinding investigation that will assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity of steel and aluminum produced in the United States.  As part of its investigation, the Commission will conduct a survey by issuing questionnaires to firms with facilities producing steel and aluminum in the United States, whether U.S. or foreign owned, to collect data on their production of these goods and associated GHG emissions. This survey will be mailed to all extruders in the United States.  The announcement made by the ITC on July 6, 2023, can be accessed here.  As requested, the USITC, an independent, nonpartisan federal agency, will prepare a public report.  The report will provide, to the extent practicable: GHG emissions intensity estimates of steel and aluminum produced in the United States by product category and production stage in 2022, with data on Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions defined as: Scope 1: Direct emissions