Skip to main content

Enforcement Issues Dominate the Agenda this Month

 Defending the AEC orders continues to be a topic that impacts our Administrative Review, scope issues, and EAPA filings.  Also, this month the AEC prepares to engage the Department of Commerce again on the Aluminum 232 and introduces the Aluminum Monitoring System to its members.

We start with our ongoing Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) cases against Kingtom.  U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) administrative review of our Kingtom EAPA case affirmed its original results, finding substantial evidence that the seven importers subject to the investigation evaded the AD/CVD Orders on Aluminum Extrusions from China.  CBP’s determination relied on several factors, including that Kingtom did not produce merchandise equal to the quantities it was exporting and that Kingtom had strong ties with China, inferring that Kingtom was able to supplement its exports of any aluminum extrusions produced in the Dominican Republic with Chinese extrusions.  CBP stated, “{W}hen looking at the totality of the circumstances regarding evidence of Kingtom’s actual production levels coupled with Kingtom’s affiliations with China, a finding of evasion due to the commingling of Chinese-origin aluminum extrusions with Dominican Republic-origin aluminum extrusions is supported by substantial evidence in the record.”  This finding is very helpful as Kingtom recently filed a Scope Challenge against the AEC stating they should be excluded from all Chinese duties because all their shipments came from local production in the Dominican Republic.  The AEC is actively engaged in this matter and will continue to pursue all legal strategies that force Kingtom to pay the duties in place against China and its entities.

The AEC has filed to appeal the decision in the Reflections Window & Wall case.  This matter was discussed in our recent podcast Episode #16.  We are confident that the precedent established in the courts about final and finished merchandise will lead to a win and reversal of Commerce’s decision.

The AEC is not convinced the Department of Commerce (DOC) understands our reasons for opposing their decision to drop the extrusion tariffs in the aluminum 232.  We have been waiting for appointments in that department to be made by the Biden Administration that we can approach about our position.  The position has been filled and we are preparing a white paper discussing the impacts on our industry by the DOC’s unilateral decision to drop the tariffs.  In addition to the white paper, we will request a meeting for us to discuss this issue in person.  At that point, we may need the members to send another round of letters to their lawmakers to have them support our position.  The data is clear.  Since the DOC dropped the tariffs, imports have risen to their highest level since before we won our China trade case.

Finally, the AEC alerted its members that the new Aluminum Monitoring System has been started by the administration and will take effect on June 28, 2021.  To help members understand the benefits and costs of this program, the AEC produced an interactive webinar in early June.  Robert DeFrancesco with Wiley Law led the discussion and took several questions from the audience.  If you missed that broadcast, you can view it on demand here.  If you have questions about the program, feel free to reach out to staff and we will get them answered.

Thank you for your continued support!  Our agenda is getting longer and without your support we simply could not impact so many issues.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Nice Win to Start the Year!

 For months you’ve read my blog posts bemoaning the terrible decisions coming out of Washington D.C. related to our case.  Well, with the New Year, we have a fresh start.  And it’s a good one!  The industry has won its first Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) case involving fencing extrusions.  On December 20, 2023, Fortress withdrew its request for an administrative review, prompting U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) to terminate the administrative review entirely. Termination of the review makes the CBP’s affirmative determination of evasion final.  When terminating the review, CBP clarified that termination does not in any way preclude CBP or other agencies from pursuing additional enforcement actions against Fortress or imposing penalties should the need arise. The other EAPA fencing case is pending, and it appears the respondent is not participating.  We submitted voluntary factual information and the company in question did not submit writte...

Keep That Ram Moving Forward

By Jason Weber, AEC VP of Government Affairs   On June 17 th , the International Trade Commission (ITC) will issue the Final Producer Questionnaire in the Aluminum Extrusion AD/CVD cases .  The questionnaire is due 30 days after it is issued .  As always, we continue to update membership with Trade Alerts as appropriate to keep them informed .  Beyond the Final Producer Questionnaire, key upcoming dates are the Final Hearing on September 9, 2024, the Final Vote on October 23, 2024, and the Final Determination on November 11 , 2024.   In last month’s essentiALs article and Fair Trade blog post, I outlined the recent Department of Commerce (DOC) changes to the 232 Aluminum Tariffs .  In that article, I outlined the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) codes that were removed from the General Approved Exclusions (GAEs):    GAE. 1.A : HTS 7609000000 (Aluminum tube or pipe fittings (for example, couplings, elbows, sleeves);   GAE. 4.A : ...

Aluminum 232 Exclusion/Objection Process in Full Swing

Since our last update, the 232 exclusion/objection process is in full swing.  Over the last several weeks we have continued to refine the workflow and communication of the exclusion requests to make sure membership continues to receive the communications and objects when appropriate. For those members that have been working through the process we at AEC HQ thank you.  If for some reason you’re an AEC Extruder Member who should be receiving these communications, please let me know at jweber@tso.net and we’ll make sure you’re added to the distribution list. Although there are new companies submitting requests, we continue to see the same entities entering the bulk of the exclusion requests.  However, for the most part the exclusion requests are much the same with slight changes here and there.  This does simplify the objection process in a way where similar objections can be filed for multiple exclusion requests. As a reminder, price is not a valid reason for a company...