Skip to main content

Coming Out of Conference with a Full Agenda

 During the Aluminum Summit in September, members heard a lot about our Fair Trade case and the tasks in front of us.  I wanted to use this opportunity to discuss the key issues and our path forward.  From Scope Challenges to the Sunset Review, the next 12 months may be the busiest time ever for our case.

The Sunset Review process is upon us.  October will feature two webinars for members this year to help you prepare for the case.  One for the production and financial piece, and one for the commercial side.  

While the templates we will fill out haven’t changed much, the climate in which we seek a renewal of orders has.  Business is strong for extruders now.  From a layman’s point of view, our industry is rock solid.  Orders are strong, new equipment has been installed, and records are being set by extruders across the country.  However, this environment has brought a significant increase in imports.  Currently, imports have a market share of 21%.  While we are busy, we may not feel the effects of this, but we all know when the downturn comes that level of penetration into our market will hurt us.  

So, the story we need to tell is that our current boost is a COVID bump and imports continue to threaten and negatively impact the domestic industry.  We will need to show the lengths China has gone through to avoid duties and find paths to our customers.  To do this, we will need your help.  So, we will discuss this with the production and finance folks in our organizations AND with the commercial leaders who can give us the field intelligence we need to show examples of how imports are taking share and forcing us to lower prices just to keep what we have.  This is very important for us this year.  So, for the first time ever, we will have a webinar with commercial folks letting them know what we need and how to report it to Wiley as they build our legal arguments.

On the scope side, we begin to prepare for the appeal in the Reflections case.  We do know that the judge assigned to this case was appointed by Trump and has been favorable to our point of view in other cases.  This is good to hear because this is going to be a tough fight.

The Administrative Review process has begun for our 10th Review.  It’s hard to imagine we have been through ten of these!  Our strategy has been set by the Fair-Trade Committee and we look forward to kicking this off.  The 9th Administrative Review is heading towards its final determination.  You may recall that in Commerce’s preliminary decision in the 9th Administrative Review earlier this year, they did find that Kingtom should be subject to our China duties.  Confidence is high that this position will hold in the final determination.

I can tell you that there are two significant issues in the Trade Enforcement arena under way.  Unfortunately, I cannot share details for obvious reasons.  I will be reaching out to members that have helped build these cases and ask for more information if available.  Since these are two new efforts, it may be several months before they move to a position where they can be discussed publicly.  It was your insight and help in this that has allowed us to take the next big steps.  Thank You!

During our breakout session covering trade enforcement at the Aluminum Summit in September, I demonstrated some of the tools we now have in place to track shipments and capture bill of lading information.  One of the key points I wanted to make is that we have found that one of the best sources for this type of field intelligence is your customers.  A lot of the cases we’ve won have come from extrusion customers that play by the rules, informing us that their competitors are not.  If you supply an industry leader in each end use, they will know if others in their industry are cheating.  If that is the case, we can help them, and you will look like a hero for helping them!  If you hear of something like this, let me know.  We’ve been quite effective in bringing these customers into the fold to help us fight circumvention.

Thank you all for your continued support.  I look forward to the next few months because I think we are going to see a lot of success in all areas of our case!  Just remember, if we stick together and combine our resources, we can make a big difference for the industry, your business, and your customers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Nice Win to Start the Year!

 For months you’ve read my blog posts bemoaning the terrible decisions coming out of Washington D.C. related to our case.  Well, with the New Year, we have a fresh start.  And it’s a good one!  The industry has won its first Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) case involving fencing extrusions.  On December 20, 2023, Fortress withdrew its request for an administrative review, prompting U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) to terminate the administrative review entirely. Termination of the review makes the CBP’s affirmative determination of evasion final.  When terminating the review, CBP clarified that termination does not in any way preclude CBP or other agencies from pursuing additional enforcement actions against Fortress or imposing penalties should the need arise. The other EAPA fencing case is pending, and it appears the respondent is not participating.  We submitted voluntary factual information and the company in question did not submit writte...

Keep That Ram Moving Forward

By Jason Weber, AEC VP of Government Affairs   On June 17 th , the International Trade Commission (ITC) will issue the Final Producer Questionnaire in the Aluminum Extrusion AD/CVD cases .  The questionnaire is due 30 days after it is issued .  As always, we continue to update membership with Trade Alerts as appropriate to keep them informed .  Beyond the Final Producer Questionnaire, key upcoming dates are the Final Hearing on September 9, 2024, the Final Vote on October 23, 2024, and the Final Determination on November 11 , 2024.   In last month’s essentiALs article and Fair Trade blog post, I outlined the recent Department of Commerce (DOC) changes to the 232 Aluminum Tariffs .  In that article, I outlined the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) codes that were removed from the General Approved Exclusions (GAEs):    GAE. 1.A : HTS 7609000000 (Aluminum tube or pipe fittings (for example, couplings, elbows, sleeves);   GAE. 4.A : ...

Aluminum 232 Exclusion/Objection Process in Full Swing

Since our last update, the 232 exclusion/objection process is in full swing.  Over the last several weeks we have continued to refine the workflow and communication of the exclusion requests to make sure membership continues to receive the communications and objects when appropriate. For those members that have been working through the process we at AEC HQ thank you.  If for some reason you’re an AEC Extruder Member who should be receiving these communications, please let me know at jweber@tso.net and we’ll make sure you’re added to the distribution list. Although there are new companies submitting requests, we continue to see the same entities entering the bulk of the exclusion requests.  However, for the most part the exclusion requests are much the same with slight changes here and there.  This does simplify the objection process in a way where similar objections can be filed for multiple exclusion requests. As a reminder, price is not a valid reason for a company...