Skip to main content

Finishing This Year With All Eyes on 2022

Next year, 2022, will be the biggest year for the AEC’s Fair Trade Case since it was launched over 10 years ago.  So, my report his month is about our planning and preparation for all that we will be doing in 2022.  Transshipment, administrative reviews, EAPA cases, scope challenges, and of course, our Sunset Review will all be in full force next year.  Here is where we are now, as we prepare.

The Fair Trade Committee is identifying the targets and scope of investigation for us to conduct in 2022.  With a new budget in place, we are empowered to begin. Several of you have been quite helpful.  Your inputs have helped us define exactly what it is we need to investigate.  I have been working with several of you in recent weeks to collect all we know to prep the investigators. We are convinced that transshipment is taking place.  Now, we need to gather the evidence.  As you know, this is not an area of work I can broadcast to the world (as much as I’d like to do so!).  However, I will keep you informed in ways that I can.

This year’s administrative review final decision has been pushed out by the Biden Administration until February 2022.  This is a critical review because we are asking the Department of Commerce (DOC) to consider Kingtom an agent of China and, therefore, subject to the duties on Chinese extrusions.  The DOC did agree with us in their preliminary decision over the summer.  Now is the time to close the deal and get that determination in February to help us address the illegal and unfair trade activities of Kingtom.

In reference to Kingtom, there are a total of three Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) claims made against Kingtom.  In every decision to date, in all three, Kingtom has been found guilty.  Through several maneuvers on their side, they continue to export millions of pounds into the U.S. and Puerto Rico.  So, we need to finalize these decisions and let them work their way through the courts.  Winning the EAPA claims and having Kingtom declared an agent of China should get us where we want.  We have been working on our EAPA cases and preparing for the next phase in the two we submitted.

The key scope decision in our queue now is the Reflections Window + Wall case.  This matter is heading to the courts.  This is an important issue for our members, and one we intend to fight until the bitter end. Since we lost this decision at the DOC last year, those products are allowed into the U.S. duty free. In most previous cases, we won the decision at Commerce, and it was the importer appealing to get duties dropped.  So, because of where we are in this matter, we need this case to happen as quickly as possible and win it as big as we can. 

Sunset Review preparations began a few weeks ago.  Our legal team is outlining what we will need, working with Commerce on the timeline and preparing our members.  Last month, we held a short webinar to review this Sunset Review’s data templates.  If you missed that, it is recorded, and you can listen to it here.  The actual template is like what we’ve used in the past.  You can find that template here.  Remember do NOT send your completed templates to AEC staff.  They must go directly to the attorneys.  Their contact information is on the template and in the recorded webinar.  We need your data by February 11, 2022.  Once it is received, Wiley will quickly convert the information into our formal filing for the case.  We only have one shot at this, so please, get this done as quickly as possible.  The most important decision our industry will get in 2022 will be the extension of our orders for another five years.  So, let’s do all we can to make that happen!

As you can read, there is a lot going on in our trade case and we are working hard to position ourselves in the closing weeks of 2021 for an outstanding result in 2022.  Thank you for your continued trust and support!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Nice Win to Start the Year!

 For months you’ve read my blog posts bemoaning the terrible decisions coming out of Washington D.C. related to our case.  Well, with the New Year, we have a fresh start.  And it’s a good one!  The industry has won its first Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) case involving fencing extrusions.  On December 20, 2023, Fortress withdrew its request for an administrative review, prompting U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) to terminate the administrative review entirely. Termination of the review makes the CBP’s affirmative determination of evasion final.  When terminating the review, CBP clarified that termination does not in any way preclude CBP or other agencies from pursuing additional enforcement actions against Fortress or imposing penalties should the need arise. The other EAPA fencing case is pending, and it appears the respondent is not participating.  We submitted voluntary factual information and the company in question did not submit writte...

Keep That Ram Moving Forward

By Jason Weber, AEC VP of Government Affairs   On June 17 th , the International Trade Commission (ITC) will issue the Final Producer Questionnaire in the Aluminum Extrusion AD/CVD cases .  The questionnaire is due 30 days after it is issued .  As always, we continue to update membership with Trade Alerts as appropriate to keep them informed .  Beyond the Final Producer Questionnaire, key upcoming dates are the Final Hearing on September 9, 2024, the Final Vote on October 23, 2024, and the Final Determination on November 11 , 2024.   In last month’s essentiALs article and Fair Trade blog post, I outlined the recent Department of Commerce (DOC) changes to the 232 Aluminum Tariffs .  In that article, I outlined the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) codes that were removed from the General Approved Exclusions (GAEs):    GAE. 1.A : HTS 7609000000 (Aluminum tube or pipe fittings (for example, couplings, elbows, sleeves);   GAE. 4.A : ...

Aluminum 232 Exclusion/Objection Process in Full Swing

Since our last update, the 232 exclusion/objection process is in full swing.  Over the last several weeks we have continued to refine the workflow and communication of the exclusion requests to make sure membership continues to receive the communications and objects when appropriate. For those members that have been working through the process we at AEC HQ thank you.  If for some reason you’re an AEC Extruder Member who should be receiving these communications, please let me know at jweber@tso.net and we’ll make sure you’re added to the distribution list. Although there are new companies submitting requests, we continue to see the same entities entering the bulk of the exclusion requests.  However, for the most part the exclusion requests are much the same with slight changes here and there.  This does simplify the objection process in a way where similar objections can be filed for multiple exclusion requests. As a reminder, price is not a valid reason for a company...