Skip to main content

AEC Sharpens Fair Trade Focus after Win in Sunset Review

 I am delighted to report that the Department of Commerce has renewed our trade orders for another five years.  This time, the Sunset Review was a rout.  With no opposition to our filing, Commerce decided to expedite its decision, thus freeing us from a long and expensive full hearing this fall.  There was very little doubt our orders would be renewed, but we did not know how long it would take or how much it would cost.  Now we know.  

This summer we will be building on the momentum of our Sunset Review victory by focusing on two issues still unresolved: the Kingtom case, and the Aluminum 232 extrusion tariffs.  Both issues will take all of our focus.  

The Kingtom case took an unexpected turn a few weeks ago during the appeal of the first Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) case against them filed by Ta Chen.  Initially, Customs sided with Ta Chen and found that Kingtom was comingling Chinese-produced extrusions with Dominican extrusions for export to the U.S.  Following that, we filed two EAPA claims.  In all three matters Customs agreed that the evidence proved Kingtom had to be comingling extrusions with Chinese production in order to run the shapes and have the capacity to ship the volumes they were exporting to the U.S.  Unfortunately, Customs has reversed its findings in the Ta Chen case and will be looking closely at ours.  This is critical as we were also successful in persuading Commerce to extend our Chinese tariffs to Kingtom because of the comingling charge.  This could be a matter of when the first domino falls then they all fall.  Of course, we will not sit by and let this happen.

All this Kingtom legal maneuvering comes while Kingtom has been shut down by the Dominican government for labor abuses.  As AEC members know, Customs uncovered worker abuses during their onsite inspection of Kingtom during our third EAPA claim.  That information was communicated by Customs to the Dominican government who has responded by shutting them down.  Even so, we are not satisfied with this and will continue to pursue our Withhold Release Order (WRO) against Kingtom asking the U.S. government to forbid U.S. imports from Kingtom.  Both the EAPA appeals and the WRO are fluid issues and a huge focus for us this summer.

Next month, the Biden Administration will hold public hearings on the Section 232.  We have petitioned Commerce seeking reinstatement of the aluminum 232 tariffs on extrusions.  Since Commerce unilaterally dropped those tariffs, imports into the U.S. have surged.  From Mexico to Vietnam, imports now sit at 25% market share.  This is the highest level of import penetration since we filed our trade case against China.  Recently, we have been working with certain legislators to gain their support in carrying our message to Commerce.  I also met with officials from Commerce and Customs last week to discuss the Kingtom and 232 issues.  They are putting me in touch with the person in charge of the extrusion portion of the 232 program.  I am hopeful I can be persuasive about our position.  We not only need the tariffs put back in place, but we need an exclusion process that recognizes that dies may have to be built to make an objection to an exclusion request, and we need the AEC to be able to object on behalf of the industry.

These are critical issues for our industry at a time when our trade case is busier than ever.  Now that the Sunset Review is behind us, we can bear down on these two remaining hot topics.  As always, I will keep you posted.  Thank you for your continued support!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Victories and Struggles: Our Mission Persists

 On December 3, 2024, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) took action in issuing a forced labor finding against Kingtom Aluminio S.R.L. (“Kingtom”).  This victory for U.S. extruders is a culmination of years of effort between the AEC and United Steel Workers (USW), which started with the initial Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) allegation filed in 2019.  As a result of this finding, CBP has authorized all port directors to seize imports of aluminum extrusions from Kingtom.   For almost 15 years the Aluminum Extrusion Fair Trade Committee (AEFTC) has worked on a wide variety of trade activities.  In defending the China I case, the AEFTC has navigated the 232 Tariffs and has worked with other organizations on EAPA allegations, along with circumvention and transshipment issues.  Thank you to all who have contributed time and resources over the years!  However, there will be more work to do.  With a new administration and 2025 fast approa...

Section 232 Implications: Get the Latest

 Recently, the AEC released a detailed fact sheet outlining the implications of Section 232 tariffs on aluminum imports, available for review on our website here. This document underscores our ongoing commitment to transparency and informed decision-making within our member base. Previously, we updated the 232 Derivative Products List to include a comprehensive breakdown of HTSUS codes and product descriptions, aimed at providing clarity for our stakeholders accessible here . Additionally, The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) within the Department of Commerce established a formal process for the addition of aluminum products designated the USHTS codes. The first window for submission opened on May 1, 2025, and closed on May 15, 2025. After the posting and public comment period occurs the BIS will make a final determination within 60 days. In addition to these regulatory updates, the Trump Administratio...

The 232 Takes Center Stage

The 232 exclusion requests, objections, rebuttals and surrebuttals process continues with the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC).  Since the exclusion process on aluminum extrusions restarted in June, AEC members have logged more than 500 objections and over 40 surrebuttals with the DOC.  While there have been a few very specific exclusion requests (i.e., hard alloy, seamless tube, etc.), objections have been limited to only one producing company.  As an industry, we have mounted a stellar defense with all exclusion requests receiving three or more objections from member companies.  At this point, there have yet to be any exclusion requests to make it to the final determination and we are hoping to have the first round of results to share at the Fall Management Conference .  However, if we do start to receive results before mid-September, we will make sure to communicate results as they are made available.  The number of 232 exclusion requests greatly decrea...