Skip to main content

It is Time for Us to Act!

 The summer of 2022 has been a disappointment to our Fair Trade efforts.  We continue to see our share of the domestic market shrink as foreign competitors enjoy a discount to U.S. aluminum prices, courtesy of the U.S. Aluminum 232.  The lack of minimum aluminum content requirements in the USMCA is creating a new threat south of our border.  

China’s Belt and Road strategy has established a growing extrusion operation in the Dominican Republic with rumors of more facilities to come in Latin America.  Our trade case continues to battle key scope issues with an administration that seems to have a deaf ear to our position.  Trade enforcement wins have turned to defeats without so much as an explanation.  This horrible combination of self-defeating U.S. policy and an administration in place that has been the softest defender of U.S. industry since Obama that left us in a position that requires us to make some very difficult decisions.

The aftermath of Customs’ inexplicable reversal in all its affirmative Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) decisions against Kingtom is perhaps the most difficult to swallow.  Everything about this matter speaks of a bad actor established with one purpose only: to destroy the U.S. market.  I want AEC members to know that this is NOT OVER!  We are filing our appeal and will be sure we have our day in court.  It’s not only the Kingtom issue that is at stake here.  The broader issue is the degradation of the EAPA program.  This has been an effective tool for us to fight trade violations.  However, recent decisions in our cases, and those in other industries, make it clear that the goalposts have moved regarding what Customs will now accept as proof of evasion.  Along with other industry leaders, the AEC is making its position known in every venue we can find.  

Also, the Federal Government has asked for a commentary and an examination into the USMCA and how it is playing out in the market.  The AEC will be participating in this process.  We must make it clear to lawmakers that not requiring a minimum North American aluminum content in the U.S. automotive market is a clear threat to the heavy investment we have made to support the move to lightweight vehicles.  We spoke about the ‘backdoor’ opportunity in Mexico for cheap Chinese aluminum to threaten our domestic market and its investments at the time the USMCA was negotiated.  Now we know that is exactly what is happening.  We cannot sit back and watch this occur.

Last month, I joined the aluminum panel during the 232 Hearings to discuss the impacts of the aluminum 232 on our industry.  The discussion was lively and quite interactive, especially for a formal meeting like this.  We know our points were heard and I continue to work behind the scenes to get access to the government officials responsible for this program and take our case right to them.  It is the 232 that has become the lubricant allowing all these other schemes and policy reversals to injure our industry.  As I said at the hearing, “In our world, spotting competitors a $.15 to .20/lb. price advantage upfront is akin to spotting Tom Brady two touchdowns in the fourth quarter!”  Frankly, I think the hearing was nothing more than window dressing.  That commission will finish its report from its findings and deliver it to Congress next March.  That means the Congress that gets the report will be different than the Congress that requested it.

Concerning scope issues, last week oral arguments were held in the Reflections Window and Wall case.  As you may recall, we lost this scope challenge and decided to appeal the decision.  While confidence is high and we hope the courts will side with us, we must understand that we will be opposed by the importer AND the Department of Commerce, since it was Commerce’s decision and they must defend it.  It will be a few months before we get the final decision.

From my seat in the auditorium, we can no longer depend on creative trade enforcement cases to protect us or rely on timely reversals from the government in counter-productive policies.  The AEC is not without options.  So, I really need you to come to the Fall Management Conference next month so we can discuss this in our breakout sessions, Town Hall, and then carry our message to Hill Day on Friday.  I hope to see you there.  

Thank you for your continued support.  We have accomplished so much together, which gives me confidence that we can overcome these challenges as well!  See you in D.C.!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Nice Win to Start the Year!

 For months you’ve read my blog posts bemoaning the terrible decisions coming out of Washington D.C. related to our case.  Well, with the New Year, we have a fresh start.  And it’s a good one!  The industry has won its first Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) case involving fencing extrusions.  On December 20, 2023, Fortress withdrew its request for an administrative review, prompting U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) to terminate the administrative review entirely. Termination of the review makes the CBP’s affirmative determination of evasion final.  When terminating the review, CBP clarified that termination does not in any way preclude CBP or other agencies from pursuing additional enforcement actions against Fortress or imposing penalties should the need arise. The other EAPA fencing case is pending, and it appears the respondent is not participating.  We submitted voluntary factual information and the company in question did not submit writte...

Keep That Ram Moving Forward

By Jason Weber, AEC VP of Government Affairs   On June 17 th , the International Trade Commission (ITC) will issue the Final Producer Questionnaire in the Aluminum Extrusion AD/CVD cases .  The questionnaire is due 30 days after it is issued .  As always, we continue to update membership with Trade Alerts as appropriate to keep them informed .  Beyond the Final Producer Questionnaire, key upcoming dates are the Final Hearing on September 9, 2024, the Final Vote on October 23, 2024, and the Final Determination on November 11 , 2024.   In last month’s essentiALs article and Fair Trade blog post, I outlined the recent Department of Commerce (DOC) changes to the 232 Aluminum Tariffs .  In that article, I outlined the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) codes that were removed from the General Approved Exclusions (GAEs):    GAE. 1.A : HTS 7609000000 (Aluminum tube or pipe fittings (for example, couplings, elbows, sleeves);   GAE. 4.A : ...

Aluminum 232 Exclusion/Objection Process in Full Swing

Since our last update, the 232 exclusion/objection process is in full swing.  Over the last several weeks we have continued to refine the workflow and communication of the exclusion requests to make sure membership continues to receive the communications and objects when appropriate. For those members that have been working through the process we at AEC HQ thank you.  If for some reason you’re an AEC Extruder Member who should be receiving these communications, please let me know at jweber@tso.net and we’ll make sure you’re added to the distribution list. Although there are new companies submitting requests, we continue to see the same entities entering the bulk of the exclusion requests.  However, for the most part the exclusion requests are much the same with slight changes here and there.  This does simplify the objection process in a way where similar objections can be filed for multiple exclusion requests. As a reminder, price is not a valid reason for a company...