Skip to main content

Time for us to Rally Together!

 Last month I held an emergency webinar to discuss breakthroughs in our 232 aluminum tariff discussions with the Department of Commerce (DOC).  Efforts to get our message to the DOC seem to be paying off–for now.  The DOC has asked our U.S. extrusion industry to make the case to have our 232 aluminum extrusion tariffs put back in place.  In my webinar, I walked through the data they want us to provide.  Many of you have done so, and I thank you!  However, others haven’t yet done so.  We need you – all of you – to help in this effort.  We may not get another shot at this.  So, let’s get it done.

The hope is that reinstatement of the 232 aluminum extrusion tariffs will dull the growing imports we are seeing.  I don’t think it will solve all our problems, but it may take some of the noise out of the system so we can see which countries are truly strategic threats.  I think we all agree that we should not initiate a trade case unless we know what impacts the 232 tariffs could have on the surge we are experiencing.

Meanwhile, our attorneys at Wiley have collected Q3 data from several extruders.  We need more!  If you have not done so, please submit your Q3 data.  If you are unclear about what I am writing about, give me a call.  Essentially, we are continuing to collect the same data we did for our Sunset Review earlier this year through the third quarter of this year.  Everyone should expect that we will want to do the same for Q4 and probably Q1 in 2023.  This close monitoring of business conditions will tell us if/when we have a solid case AND what duties to expect if we win.  We are all seeing our market deteriorate.  So, let’s not wait until we are on our backs, let’s do something about it now.

In other news, the AEC has prepared comments in two additional matters.  The first is the Inflation Reduction Act.  We have submitted comments asking the Administration to encourage domestic supply of aluminum extrusions in the renewable space (and elsewhere where appropriate).  This is controversial.  The Solar Energy Industry Association (SEIA) opposes our position stating they need access to cheap foreign parts.  Also, we are preparing comments on the USMCA about the aluminum content requirement and country of origin for the automotive industry.  This is a hot topic and a clear miss by our government in the USMCA negotiations.  

EAPA activity continues to be stalled.  Kingtom EAPA appeals are moving forward, and we do intend to fight hard.  Most likely, this won’t get to the courts before spring 2023.  Movement on other EAPA cases pending is still sluggish.  It appears we have a new case initiated, but they aren’t even confirming that with us.  I have let everyone in government know how disgusted we are with the way this administration has backed off trade enforcement.  I don’t know if it helps, but at least they know.

This year’s administrative reviews are nearly complete, so we look for the final decision on the new tariff rates in our China case.  We expect there to be no changes to the rates.  Participation in these annual reviews has really diminished.  As a result, there is nothing in the system that could cause the DOC to lower our current tariffs.

Elsewhere, the news has hit the press about Zhong Wang’s (ZW) bankruptcy.  I’ve fielded several questions about this issue and its impact on our market.  Frankly, for us, it’s a non-event.  We ‘defeated’ ZW years ago and they have been ‘dead man walking’ ever since.  Their direct shipments to the U.S. have been minimal, and to the extent they participated in illegal trade activity, someone else in China will surely pick up the slack.  ZW is a state-owned entity.  The plants they built and the presses they installed aren’t being shut down.  The Chinese government will find new lieutenants to run the operation and it will be more of the same.  Nevertheless, we should delight in the knowledge that our little group was able to stand up to these bullies and win.  The confidence we should feel from this will energize our efforts to stop other unfair and illegal trade activities – no matter the form in which they come.

It was your support and efforts that allowed us to win in our trade war against China.  Now, we must lean on that experience to guide us in the coming months on the best avenue we should take to protect our industry.  Let’s rally around this, get your data into Wiley and start making it happen.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Nice Win to Start the Year!

 For months you’ve read my blog posts bemoaning the terrible decisions coming out of Washington D.C. related to our case.  Well, with the New Year, we have a fresh start.  And it’s a good one!  The industry has won its first Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) case involving fencing extrusions.  On December 20, 2023, Fortress withdrew its request for an administrative review, prompting U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) to terminate the administrative review entirely. Termination of the review makes the CBP’s affirmative determination of evasion final.  When terminating the review, CBP clarified that termination does not in any way preclude CBP or other agencies from pursuing additional enforcement actions against Fortress or imposing penalties should the need arise. The other EAPA fencing case is pending, and it appears the respondent is not participating.  We submitted voluntary factual information and the company in question did not submit writte...

Keep That Ram Moving Forward

By Jason Weber, AEC VP of Government Affairs   On June 17 th , the International Trade Commission (ITC) will issue the Final Producer Questionnaire in the Aluminum Extrusion AD/CVD cases .  The questionnaire is due 30 days after it is issued .  As always, we continue to update membership with Trade Alerts as appropriate to keep them informed .  Beyond the Final Producer Questionnaire, key upcoming dates are the Final Hearing on September 9, 2024, the Final Vote on October 23, 2024, and the Final Determination on November 11 , 2024.   In last month’s essentiALs article and Fair Trade blog post, I outlined the recent Department of Commerce (DOC) changes to the 232 Aluminum Tariffs .  In that article, I outlined the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) codes that were removed from the General Approved Exclusions (GAEs):    GAE. 1.A : HTS 7609000000 (Aluminum tube or pipe fittings (for example, couplings, elbows, sleeves);   GAE. 4.A : ...

Aluminum 232 Exclusion/Objection Process in Full Swing

Since our last update, the 232 exclusion/objection process is in full swing.  Over the last several weeks we have continued to refine the workflow and communication of the exclusion requests to make sure membership continues to receive the communications and objects when appropriate. For those members that have been working through the process we at AEC HQ thank you.  If for some reason you’re an AEC Extruder Member who should be receiving these communications, please let me know at jweber@tso.net and we’ll make sure you’re added to the distribution list. Although there are new companies submitting requests, we continue to see the same entities entering the bulk of the exclusion requests.  However, for the most part the exclusion requests are much the same with slight changes here and there.  This does simplify the objection process in a way where similar objections can be filed for multiple exclusion requests. As a reminder, price is not a valid reason for a company...