Skip to main content

Government Outreach is Paying Dividends for AEC Members

As we work on a new trade case, government affairs issues have taken center stage in recent weeks. AEC members have been working with their local elected officials and their staff over the last few weeks. In this effort we have applied pressure on these lawmakers to help us find resolutions in the Aluminum 232 General Approved Exclusions (GAEs), the surge in imports from Mexico (USMCA and 232), and the overall state of our industry as a result of these failed government policies.


Since that time, Bonnell Aluminum hosted a visit to their Utah plant for Senator Mitt Romney. Western Extrusions has leaned on their representative to set up a meeting with key officials this month in Washington, D.C. to discuss our trade concerns with House Ways and Means committee staff. Taber Extrusions has initiated a Senate letter by their Arkansas Senator, Tom Cotton. Working with members, our lobbyists are circulating the letter for bipartisan support to ‘close the deal' on the Commerce Department's commitment to us to remove those GAEs.

As we've pursued these discussions, we are learning more about the Inflation Reduction Act and how it will be administered. A new tax credit is available for new investments that meet certain criteria. We will be hosting a webinar very soon to tell you how you may be able to take advantage of this program.

All this activity shows us the power of our voice. Only three members working on these issues have found their way into the type of conversations we need to have. What would happen if 10 members joined the effort? What if we all did? Think about it. We don't represent a huge industry. However, we are in over 30 states. This gives us a chance to say what we can't do with size, we make up for in volume!! (Doesn't that sound familiar?)

Changing gears, there have been some updates to our case against China. In a strange development, Sinobec has launched a scope challenge against a Vietnamese supplier of extruded solar panels. They claim the extrusions are made in China and are not substantially changed enough in Vietnam to avoid tariffs. We will follow this one with popcorn.

Commerce rejected Kaivac's scope request to not pay tariffs on imported mop handle products. Their filing was weak and, thus, rejected.

The Fortress Fence Post Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) filing is underway and being investigated. More to come on this one in late summer.

Customs also announced an EAPA investigation against Minth auto parts. Unfortunately, interim duties were not applied. We are engaged in this matter and will report on its progress accordingly.

The door threshold case is in the appeals courts. We asked the court to combine all these cases to expedite the process. The court agreed. Opening briefs are due later this month.

In our Administrative Reviews, Commerce issued final results in the countervailing duties (CVD) review covering the 2021 period of review and assigned a rate of 293.85% based on the application of adverse facts available, as expected. We withdrew completely from the antidumping (AD) review covering the prior period of review.

Look for announcements this month of webinars about tax credit opportunities within the Inflation Reduction Act and updates on our new trade case. Once the coalition is finalized, we are going to have A LOT to talk about! Have a safe and enjoyable start to your summer. Thank you for your continued support!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Victories and Struggles: Our Mission Persists

 On December 3, 2024, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) took action in issuing a forced labor finding against Kingtom Aluminio S.R.L. (“Kingtom”).  This victory for U.S. extruders is a culmination of years of effort between the AEC and United Steel Workers (USW), which started with the initial Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) allegation filed in 2019.  As a result of this finding, CBP has authorized all port directors to seize imports of aluminum extrusions from Kingtom.   For almost 15 years the Aluminum Extrusion Fair Trade Committee (AEFTC) has worked on a wide variety of trade activities.  In defending the China I case, the AEFTC has navigated the 232 Tariffs and has worked with other organizations on EAPA allegations, along with circumvention and transshipment issues.  Thank you to all who have contributed time and resources over the years!  However, there will be more work to do.  With a new administration and 2025 fast approa...

Section 232 Implications: Get the Latest

 Recently, the AEC released a detailed fact sheet outlining the implications of Section 232 tariffs on aluminum imports, available for review on our website here. This document underscores our ongoing commitment to transparency and informed decision-making within our member base. Previously, we updated the 232 Derivative Products List to include a comprehensive breakdown of HTSUS codes and product descriptions, aimed at providing clarity for our stakeholders accessible here . Additionally, The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) within the Department of Commerce established a formal process for the addition of aluminum products designated the USHTS codes. The first window for submission opened on May 1, 2025, and closed on May 15, 2025. After the posting and public comment period occurs the BIS will make a final determination within 60 days. In addition to these regulatory updates, the Trump Administratio...

The 232 Takes Center Stage

The 232 exclusion requests, objections, rebuttals and surrebuttals process continues with the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC).  Since the exclusion process on aluminum extrusions restarted in June, AEC members have logged more than 500 objections and over 40 surrebuttals with the DOC.  While there have been a few very specific exclusion requests (i.e., hard alloy, seamless tube, etc.), objections have been limited to only one producing company.  As an industry, we have mounted a stellar defense with all exclusion requests receiving three or more objections from member companies.  At this point, there have yet to be any exclusion requests to make it to the final determination and we are hoping to have the first round of results to share at the Fall Management Conference .  However, if we do start to receive results before mid-September, we will make sure to communicate results as they are made available.  The number of 232 exclusion requests greatly decrea...