Skip to main content

Aluminum Extruders Coalition Files Historic Case; Customs Says “Yes”

By

Well, in case you missed it, a group of Aluminum Extruders Council members filed a historic AD/CVD case against 15 countries.  All 15 countries will be sued for dumping (AD), and four will be sued for subsidies (CVD).  In a press release issued earlier this week, which you can read here, the countries were identified as well as the projected duties the coalition seeks. 

Anyone within the four walls of the Aluminum Extruders Council knew this was coming.  It has been discussed for four years.  To address rising imports, we battled in the enforcement arena, we went hard after products under assault in scope challenges and worked hard on the 232.  After exhausting every available option, and never seeing a dent in the import stats, we were faced with this hard decision.  That is where we are today.  The Hearing will be held later this month, and decisions will start to be rendered in the weeks that follow.  Communications about the details of this case will be handled by the Coalition, who have committed to underwriting the first two years of expenses in this case, and those that donate to the effort.  If you are interested in joining the coalition or donating to the effort, please contact me at jhenderson@tso.net.

Meanwhile, we continue to manage an active China case.  This month we’ve received positive news as we work on issues at Customs, and in the courts.  Two EAPA claims alleging transshipment are moving forward.  Briefs in these cases will be issued in the coming weeks.  The door threshold matter, which is still in the courts, is expected to hold oral arguments in Q1 2024.  During that same period, we expect oral arguments in the Kingtom EAPA claims.  The ball is moving in our direction, and it’s about time!

On the Aluminum 232 tariffs, we have submitted comments in the latest round of inquiries by the Department of Commerce.  As ridiculous as this has gotten – the same arguments repeatedly leading only to another hearing – it does seem we have a real chance of getting our 232 aluminum extrusion tariffs re-instated.  This is important as it creates a partial barrier to entry into our market that could discourage future “Belt and Road” projects by the Chinese in third countries.  The comment period is ending, and we will be conducting a webinar for members in which we provide you with a letter you can customize and send to your elected officials.  We will also have their contact information.  If you are an AEC member register for the webinar here.

Clearly, there are several high-powered issues we are pushing to protect and save our industry from unfair and illegal trade practices.  This is the foundation on which we stand.  We believe in free trade, but it must be fair.  It is not fair today, and we aim to fix that.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Valuation, USMCA, and Fair Trade Priorities

By
 The primary focus of our government affairs work at this moment centers on the Section 232 valuation issue currently under discussion in Washington, D.C.  As highlighted during the recent Aluminum Summit and in prior AEC communications, there remains uncertainty regarding how the Administration intends to resolve this matter. The original Executive Order that established the Section 232 aluminum tariffs made clear that the tariffs were intended to apply to the full value of the imported aluminum extrusion, not solely the value of the aluminum content within the product.  At this time, it remains unclear whether the Administration will seek to address the issue by issuing a new Executive Order or by providing additional interpretive guidance through U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).  The AEC is actively monitoring these discussions and will update members as soon as a definitive course of action emerges. Parallel to the valuation discussions, attention is tur...
Post a Comment
Read more

Section 232 Implications: Get the Latest

By
 Recently, the AEC released a detailed fact sheet outlining the implications of Section 232 tariffs on aluminum imports, available for review on our website here. This document underscores our ongoing commitment to transparency and informed decision-making within our member base. Previously, we updated the 232 Derivative Products List to include a comprehensive breakdown of HTSUS codes and product descriptions, aimed at providing clarity for our stakeholders accessible here . Additionally, The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) within the Department of Commerce established a formal process for the addition of aluminum products designated the USHTS codes. The first window for submission opened on May 1, 2025, and closed on May 15, 2025. After the posting and public comment period occurs the BIS will make a final determination within 60 days. In addition to these regulatory updates, the Trump Administratio...
Post a Comment
Read more

AEC Testifies at USMCA Hearing in Washington

By
Since the AEC’s last Government Affairs update, the Council participated in the U.S.–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA) hearing held in Washington, DC, from December 3–5. The hearing drew more than 200 participants representing a broad range of perspectives on the future of the agreement. The AEC appeared on a panel immediately following the steel industry, and it was noteworthy how closely aligned many of the challenges facing aluminum extruders are with those impacting steel producers—particularly with respect to trade enforcement, circumvention, and market distortion. These discussions reinforced the importance of maintaining a strong, competitive aluminum extrusion industry and underscored the essential role our sector plays as a supplier of critical inputs across construction, transportation, energy, and numerous other segments of the North American economy. During our testimony, the AEC used the hearing as an opportunity to highlight ongoing concerns regarding trade circumventio...
Post a Comment
Read more