Skip to main content

Aluminum Extruders Coalition Files Historic Case; Customs Says “Yes”

By

Well, in case you missed it, a group of Aluminum Extruders Council members filed a historic AD/CVD case against 15 countries.  All 15 countries will be sued for dumping (AD), and four will be sued for subsidies (CVD).  In a press release issued earlier this week, which you can read here, the countries were identified as well as the projected duties the coalition seeks. 

Anyone within the four walls of the Aluminum Extruders Council knew this was coming.  It has been discussed for four years.  To address rising imports, we battled in the enforcement arena, we went hard after products under assault in scope challenges and worked hard on the 232.  After exhausting every available option, and never seeing a dent in the import stats, we were faced with this hard decision.  That is where we are today.  The Hearing will be held later this month, and decisions will start to be rendered in the weeks that follow.  Communications about the details of this case will be handled by the Coalition, who have committed to underwriting the first two years of expenses in this case, and those that donate to the effort.  If you are interested in joining the coalition or donating to the effort, please contact me at jhenderson@tso.net.

Meanwhile, we continue to manage an active China case.  This month we’ve received positive news as we work on issues at Customs, and in the courts.  Two EAPA claims alleging transshipment are moving forward.  Briefs in these cases will be issued in the coming weeks.  The door threshold matter, which is still in the courts, is expected to hold oral arguments in Q1 2024.  During that same period, we expect oral arguments in the Kingtom EAPA claims.  The ball is moving in our direction, and it’s about time!

On the Aluminum 232 tariffs, we have submitted comments in the latest round of inquiries by the Department of Commerce.  As ridiculous as this has gotten – the same arguments repeatedly leading only to another hearing – it does seem we have a real chance of getting our 232 aluminum extrusion tariffs re-instated.  This is important as it creates a partial barrier to entry into our market that could discourage future “Belt and Road” projects by the Chinese in third countries.  The comment period is ending, and we will be conducting a webinar for members in which we provide you with a letter you can customize and send to your elected officials.  We will also have their contact information.  If you are an AEC member register for the webinar here.

Clearly, there are several high-powered issues we are pushing to protect and save our industry from unfair and illegal trade practices.  This is the foundation on which we stand.  We believe in free trade, but it must be fair.  It is not fair today, and we aim to fix that.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Victories and Struggles: Our Mission Persists

By
 On December 3, 2024, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) took action in issuing a forced labor finding against Kingtom Aluminio S.R.L. (“Kingtom”).  This victory for U.S. extruders is a culmination of years of effort between the AEC and United Steel Workers (USW), which started with the initial Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) allegation filed in 2019.  As a result of this finding, CBP has authorized all port directors to seize imports of aluminum extrusions from Kingtom.   For almost 15 years the Aluminum Extrusion Fair Trade Committee (AEFTC) has worked on a wide variety of trade activities.  In defending the China I case, the AEFTC has navigated the 232 Tariffs and has worked with other organizations on EAPA allegations, along with circumvention and transshipment issues.  Thank you to all who have contributed time and resources over the years!  However, there will be more work to do.  With a new administration and 2025 fast approa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Section 232 Implications: Get the Latest

By
 Recently, the AEC released a detailed fact sheet outlining the implications of Section 232 tariffs on aluminum imports, available for review on our website here. This document underscores our ongoing commitment to transparency and informed decision-making within our member base. Previously, we updated the 232 Derivative Products List to include a comprehensive breakdown of HTSUS codes and product descriptions, aimed at providing clarity for our stakeholders accessible here . Additionally, The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) within the Department of Commerce established a formal process for the addition of aluminum products designated the USHTS codes. The first window for submission opened on May 1, 2025, and closed on May 15, 2025. After the posting and public comment period occurs the BIS will make a final determination within 60 days. In addition to these regulatory updates, the Trump Administratio...
Post a Comment
Read more

The 232 Takes Center Stage

By
The 232 exclusion requests, objections, rebuttals and surrebuttals process continues with the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC).  Since the exclusion process on aluminum extrusions restarted in June, AEC members have logged more than 500 objections and over 40 surrebuttals with the DOC.  While there have been a few very specific exclusion requests (i.e., hard alloy, seamless tube, etc.), objections have been limited to only one producing company.  As an industry, we have mounted a stellar defense with all exclusion requests receiving three or more objections from member companies.  At this point, there have yet to be any exclusion requests to make it to the final determination and we are hoping to have the first round of results to share at the Fall Management Conference .  However, if we do start to receive results before mid-September, we will make sure to communicate results as they are made available.  The number of 232 exclusion requests greatly decrea...
Post a Comment
Read more