Skip to main content

Aluminum Extruders Coalition are Heroes

 The fair-trade efforts of the United States aluminum extrusion industry have certainly changed in 2023.  A year ago today, AEC members were evaluating their best strategy to address illegal and unfairly imported extrusions.  Having exhausted every effort through legislation, agency work, defense of our China orders, and so much more, aluminum extruders came together to form the Aluminum Extruders Coalition.  This group of heroic extruders took the bold step to form and file a trade case.  That case was filed against 15 countries.  In all cases an antidumping case was filed, and in four of those cases there was also a countervailing subsidy case filed.  That filing has shocked the world.

As the trade case moved from concept and planning to launching and filing, a lot of work was being done to be as inclusive in this process as possible.  The more voices the Coalition had the more input available to make our case.  Furthermore, these filings are extremely expensive.  This is the essence of heroism.  Even when others chose not to contribute to the case, the Coalition members still forged ahead.  This is reminiscent of the first trade case.  At that time, twelve extruders formed a coalition called the Aluminum Extruders Fair Trade Committee.  Most members don’t know that the AEC was never the filing group in the first China case.  Like in the first case, coalition members guaranteed payment of legal fees and carried the water in pulling data and arguments together, flying to Washington D.C. to lobby the case, and much more.  I was a part of that coalition working for an extruder.  From my own experience, I imagine these leaders are pouring 20-40 hours a week into this case now.  This is an exhausting effort.  Everyone that produces extrusions in the U.S. will benefit from this case even though they did nothing to help it.  So, I say it again, for those that write the checks when others won’t, for those that find the hours to work the case, for those that have really put their businesses on the line, you are the heroes.

Many AEC members are contributing to the case in several ways.  I thank them as well.  Many of them have had internal battles with ownership that doesn’t have the same ambitions in our industry that we do.

For those on the outside, I encourage you to get involved.  With 14 countries and thousands of extrusion applications, there will be tough decisions the Coalition has to make.  Which scope challenge do we fight?  It often comes down to money.  You can’t fight if you don’t have the resources.  What that means to you is that a key product may be excluded and you suddenly find yourself losing your top customers.  By then it will be too late.  That application will never be covered and you will have to adapt.  It happened in the first China case and some extruders paid a heavy price.  Please, don’t let that happen to you.

Elsewhere, in our original China case, we continue to find a handful of scope challenges.  We have arguments in the KingTom Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) matter in January.  Those matters will be worked as it makes sense for us to do so.  In some cases, the new scope will take care of those open matters.

The Aluminum 232 General Approved Exclusions (GAE) evaluation continues.  We are still in touch with the Department of Commerce.  Sadly, there is NO deadline for a decision and no indication they intend to make any decisions.  We will keep updating you on this matter.

And finally, let’s discuss the little tiff we had with the Aluminum Association over the last couple of weeks.  First, as far as I am concerned, the tiff is over.  I wanted our members to understand my view.  Next spring, we will celebrate our 75th year anniversary as a trade association.  The charter of the AEC expressly stated that the AEC was formed to create a voice for the independent extruder.  The business case to form a common voice has been displayed over the decades.  Whether we fought aluminum ingot rationing, competing materials, imports, trade legislation, or even those within our industry that wish to overshadow our need to survive while promoting policies that at a minimum do nothing to help our cause, and at their worst are intended to torpedo our efforts for their own glory.  So, when this president sees bullies trying to dictate to us ‘what is going to be’ I am compelled to stand up for my members and say something about it.  So, I did. 

The AEC has been clear since Day One about the 232.  We oppose it.  We’ve spent a huge amount of time and money opposing it.  We have petitioned the Mexican industry for dumping.  How on earth could we ever support a permanent exclusion for Mexico?  Seriously?  And, to somehow take a shot at the DOMESTIC extrusion industry because the timing of our case makes their fools run a little more complicated…well we just can’t have that.  That spectacle was shameful.  If Mexico wants to report their import numbers, they can.  They chose not to do so.  Why?  I don’t know.  But it’s a violation of the USMCA.  I think you get the point. 

The AEC has a purpose.  It has demonstrated that to the world this year.  We all should be proud of these members that have stepped up.  Now, let’s rally around them by supporting them while they save our industry.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aluminum Extruders Coalition Files Historic Case; Customs Says “Yes”

Well, in case you missed it, a group of Aluminum Extruders Council members filed a historic AD/CVD case against 15 countries.  All 15 countries will be sued for dumping (AD), and four will be sued for subsidies (CVD).  In a press release issued earlier this week, which you can read here , the countries were identified as well as the projected duties the coalition seeks.  Anyone within the four walls of the Aluminum Extruders Council knew this was coming.  It has been discussed for four years.  To address rising imports, we battled in the enforcement arena, we went hard after products under assault in scope challenges and worked hard on the 232.  After exhausting every available option, and never seeing a dent in the import stats, we were faced with this hard decision.  That is where we are today.  The Hearing will be held later this month, and decisions will start to be rendered in the weeks that follow.  Communications about the details of this case will be handled by the Coalition,

A Nice Win to Start the Year!

 For months you’ve read my blog posts bemoaning the terrible decisions coming out of Washington D.C. related to our case.  Well, with the New Year, we have a fresh start.  And it’s a good one!  The industry has won its first Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) case involving fencing extrusions.  On December 20, 2023, Fortress withdrew its request for an administrative review, prompting U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) to terminate the administrative review entirely. Termination of the review makes the CBP’s affirmative determination of evasion final.  When terminating the review, CBP clarified that termination does not in any way preclude CBP or other agencies from pursuing additional enforcement actions against Fortress or imposing penalties should the need arise. The other EAPA fencing case is pending, and it appears the respondent is not participating.  We submitted voluntary factual information and the company in question did not submit written arguments by the November 6, 202

USITC Issues 332 to Assess Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Where Sustainability Meets Trade Policy

  The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) is undertaking a new factfinding investigation that will assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity of steel and aluminum produced in the United States.  As part of its investigation, the Commission will conduct a survey by issuing questionnaires to firms with facilities producing steel and aluminum in the United States, whether U.S. or foreign owned, to collect data on their production of these goods and associated GHG emissions. This survey will be mailed to all extruders in the United States.  The announcement made by the ITC on July 6, 2023, can be accessed here.  As requested, the USITC, an independent, nonpartisan federal agency, will prepare a public report.  The report will provide, to the extent practicable: GHG emissions intensity estimates of steel and aluminum produced in the United States by product category and production stage in 2022, with data on Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions defined as: Scope 1: Direct emissions