Skip to main content

Aluminum Extruders Coalition are Heroes

 The fair-trade efforts of the United States aluminum extrusion industry have certainly changed in 2023.  A year ago today, AEC members were evaluating their best strategy to address illegal and unfairly imported extrusions.  Having exhausted every effort through legislation, agency work, defense of our China orders, and so much more, aluminum extruders came together to form the Aluminum Extruders Coalition.  This group of heroic extruders took the bold step to form and file a trade case.  That case was filed against 15 countries.  In all cases an antidumping case was filed, and in four of those cases there was also a countervailing subsidy case filed.  That filing has shocked the world.

As the trade case moved from concept and planning to launching and filing, a lot of work was being done to be as inclusive in this process as possible.  The more voices the Coalition had the more input available to make our case.  Furthermore, these filings are extremely expensive.  This is the essence of heroism.  Even when others chose not to contribute to the case, the Coalition members still forged ahead.  This is reminiscent of the first trade case.  At that time, twelve extruders formed a coalition called the Aluminum Extruders Fair Trade Committee.  Most members don’t know that the AEC was never the filing group in the first China case.  Like in the first case, coalition members guaranteed payment of legal fees and carried the water in pulling data and arguments together, flying to Washington D.C. to lobby the case, and much more.  I was a part of that coalition working for an extruder.  From my own experience, I imagine these leaders are pouring 20-40 hours a week into this case now.  This is an exhausting effort.  Everyone that produces extrusions in the U.S. will benefit from this case even though they did nothing to help it.  So, I say it again, for those that write the checks when others won’t, for those that find the hours to work the case, for those that have really put their businesses on the line, you are the heroes.

Many AEC members are contributing to the case in several ways.  I thank them as well.  Many of them have had internal battles with ownership that doesn’t have the same ambitions in our industry that we do.

For those on the outside, I encourage you to get involved.  With 14 countries and thousands of extrusion applications, there will be tough decisions the Coalition has to make.  Which scope challenge do we fight?  It often comes down to money.  You can’t fight if you don’t have the resources.  What that means to you is that a key product may be excluded and you suddenly find yourself losing your top customers.  By then it will be too late.  That application will never be covered and you will have to adapt.  It happened in the first China case and some extruders paid a heavy price.  Please, don’t let that happen to you.

Elsewhere, in our original China case, we continue to find a handful of scope challenges.  We have arguments in the KingTom Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) matter in January.  Those matters will be worked as it makes sense for us to do so.  In some cases, the new scope will take care of those open matters.

The Aluminum 232 General Approved Exclusions (GAE) evaluation continues.  We are still in touch with the Department of Commerce.  Sadly, there is NO deadline for a decision and no indication they intend to make any decisions.  We will keep updating you on this matter.

And finally, let’s discuss the little tiff we had with the Aluminum Association over the last couple of weeks.  First, as far as I am concerned, the tiff is over.  I wanted our members to understand my view.  Next spring, we will celebrate our 75th year anniversary as a trade association.  The charter of the AEC expressly stated that the AEC was formed to create a voice for the independent extruder.  The business case to form a common voice has been displayed over the decades.  Whether we fought aluminum ingot rationing, competing materials, imports, trade legislation, or even those within our industry that wish to overshadow our need to survive while promoting policies that at a minimum do nothing to help our cause, and at their worst are intended to torpedo our efforts for their own glory.  So, when this president sees bullies trying to dictate to us ‘what is going to be’ I am compelled to stand up for my members and say something about it.  So, I did. 

The AEC has been clear since Day One about the 232.  We oppose it.  We’ve spent a huge amount of time and money opposing it.  We have petitioned the Mexican industry for dumping.  How on earth could we ever support a permanent exclusion for Mexico?  Seriously?  And, to somehow take a shot at the DOMESTIC extrusion industry because the timing of our case makes their fools run a little more complicated…well we just can’t have that.  That spectacle was shameful.  If Mexico wants to report their import numbers, they can.  They chose not to do so.  Why?  I don’t know.  But it’s a violation of the USMCA.  I think you get the point. 

The AEC has a purpose.  It has demonstrated that to the world this year.  We all should be proud of these members that have stepped up.  Now, let’s rally around them by supporting them while they save our industry.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Nice Win to Start the Year!

 For months you’ve read my blog posts bemoaning the terrible decisions coming out of Washington D.C. related to our case.  Well, with the New Year, we have a fresh start.  And it’s a good one!  The industry has won its first Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) case involving fencing extrusions.  On December 20, 2023, Fortress withdrew its request for an administrative review, prompting U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) to terminate the administrative review entirely. Termination of the review makes the CBP’s affirmative determination of evasion final.  When terminating the review, CBP clarified that termination does not in any way preclude CBP or other agencies from pursuing additional enforcement actions against Fortress or imposing penalties should the need arise. The other EAPA fencing case is pending, and it appears the respondent is not participating.  We submitted voluntary factual information and the company in question did not submit writte...

Keep That Ram Moving Forward

By Jason Weber, AEC VP of Government Affairs   On June 17 th , the International Trade Commission (ITC) will issue the Final Producer Questionnaire in the Aluminum Extrusion AD/CVD cases .  The questionnaire is due 30 days after it is issued .  As always, we continue to update membership with Trade Alerts as appropriate to keep them informed .  Beyond the Final Producer Questionnaire, key upcoming dates are the Final Hearing on September 9, 2024, the Final Vote on October 23, 2024, and the Final Determination on November 11 , 2024.   In last month’s essentiALs article and Fair Trade blog post, I outlined the recent Department of Commerce (DOC) changes to the 232 Aluminum Tariffs .  In that article, I outlined the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) codes that were removed from the General Approved Exclusions (GAEs):    GAE. 1.A : HTS 7609000000 (Aluminum tube or pipe fittings (for example, couplings, elbows, sleeves);   GAE. 4.A : ...

Aluminum 232 Exclusion/Objection Process in Full Swing

Since our last update, the 232 exclusion/objection process is in full swing.  Over the last several weeks we have continued to refine the workflow and communication of the exclusion requests to make sure membership continues to receive the communications and objects when appropriate. For those members that have been working through the process we at AEC HQ thank you.  If for some reason you’re an AEC Extruder Member who should be receiving these communications, please let me know at jweber@tso.net and we’ll make sure you’re added to the distribution list. Although there are new companies submitting requests, we continue to see the same entities entering the bulk of the exclusion requests.  However, for the most part the exclusion requests are much the same with slight changes here and there.  This does simplify the objection process in a way where similar objections can be filed for multiple exclusion requests. As a reminder, price is not a valid reason for a company...