Skip to main content

Fighting the Fair Trade Battle: A learning process for long-term success

AEC Past Chairman Duncan Crowdis
When we embarked on this process to defend our industry against an exponentially escalating level of Chinese imports in 2009, there were many things we did not know about the journey we were about to take.

What we DID KNOW was that the industry’s future was at stake. We had done enough research to understand what China was doing and why (to be covered in a future blog) and that the 20% market share that they had taken was not going to be their stopping point. Something had to be done or we strongly believed that we would eventually lose the bulk of our market. What we also knew was that extruders are generally passionate about their businesses. It has been a lifetime’s livelihood for many of us, often starting with our parents and now one in which many of our children are counting on for their livelihood. No – while the Chinese are obviously formidable, what they were doing was and is predatory and illegal and we weren’t about to let them do this to us.

What we didn’t truly understand is where the process we faced was going to take us. Our original understanding was that it was a front-end-loaded process – a lot of work and information to pull together as we prepared our original case presented to the U.S. Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission (ITC). Following a successful outcome, defined by duties being levied against imports from China, we anticipated the following steps:
  • A year or two of work to fight some potential appeals and what are called “scope requests”, which are requests for clarification from a U.S. importer who believes the products they import from China do not fall under the scope of the Department of Commerce orders
  • We also knew there would be an annual “administrative review” but were led to believe this was just a “minor” formality
  • And finally, every 5 years there would be what is termed a “sunset review”, which basically opens up the case to ensure there is still dumping and subsidies going on and, if so, the domestic industry remains “in harm’s way” because of them

Chock it up to naivety, a victim of our own success or the luck of the draw, but in our case, from the time we won the case in April 2011, we have battled over 50 scope requests (a number of them very involved and complex) and over half a dozen appeals. On top of that, the annual administrative reviews are turning out to be anything but a “non-event” with more than 70 importers and Chinese producers entering a challenge to the level of duties. While not quite as complex and demanding as the original case, it is not far from it.

What this means is time and money. These cases are very technical and legally complex requiring the expertise of a specialized legal firm which, of course, is not inexpensive.  The time commitment for those involved in the case is significant, often taking several days a week of time--time away from our businesses that are always in need of our focus. In addition, a number of us have travelled to Washington on multiple occasions to meet with staff at Commerce, the ITC and our various members of Congress.

Our learning is that this process, at least in our case, is NOT simply a front-end-loaded two- or three-year project. It is likely a process that will go on for many years to come.

As naive as we were when we started this process, we are no less passionate today than we were in in 2009. We took on this case because we believed the industry was in peril. We believe that today more than ever. 

The AEC has responded by settling in for the long haul by committing an appropriate level of resources and establishing an infrastructure and fund raising process that will allow us to keep fighting to maintain the benefits of this hard-fought win for years to come.

All U.S. extruders and suppliers to extruders need to stand up and be counted.  By banding together, we leveled the playing field.  Now we need to recommit to stay together to keep the field level, the rules enforced and the customers coming. What part are you playing in this fight? Contact the AEC to see how you can help.

For more information on the AEC Fair Trade...It Matters! campaign visit

This post was written by AEC Past Chairman Duncan Crowdis


Popular posts from this blog

Several Key Issues in Play

As we head into December there are several key issues in play.

Sunset Review Wiley Rein has gathered information from the industry and is quickly converting that into a filing for our case.  They have told me that we had a good representation of the industry in the data collected.

Remaining Timeline January 10, 2017Prehearing Report Issued
January 18, 2017 Prehearing Briefs
January 19, 2017 Request to appear at Hearing
January 25, 2017 Prehearing Conference
January 26, 2017 Hearing
February 6, 2017 Post-Hearing Briefs
February 23, 2017 Report to the Commission (APO Release)
March 1, 2017         APO Release
March 3, 2017         Final Comments
March 10, 2017         Commission Vote
March 27, 2017         Determination Expected

Administrative Review We received the DOC’s final determination in this year’s Administrative Review.  As expected, Commerce found that Chinese producers dumped aluminum extrusions in the U.S. market during the period of review (May 2014-April 2015) in margins r…

Chinese Extrusion Transshipments through Vietnam

In recent months there have been a growing number of reports about aluminum extrusions being imported into the United States from Vietnam.  This recent spike comes at a time when the AEC is watching such reports and import data very carefully.  Given the current policies of the Government of China to export their way out of their self-created overcapacity problems, the AEC is becoming more concerned about the prospect of transshipments from Chinese extruders through Vietnam.

AEC members are asked to contact Jeff Henderson with any reports gathered from the field regarding Vietnamese extrusions coming into the U.S.  All reports will be treated in strict confidence.  It must be determined whether or not there is a pattern in what is being imported.  This pattern could appear in end use markets being targeted, names of the companies exporting product from Vietnam, types of extrusions and finishing, etc.

So, please let Jeff know what you are seeing in the field.  He can be reached at 847.…

Special Report: Details Behind the China Zhongwang Case Filing

As noted in our post from October 23, the Aluminum Extruders Council filed a Circumvention and Scope Clarification case against China Zhongwang (ZW).  Mounting evidence from private investigators, testimony from former employees, data from online import and export databases, and anecdotal evidence from a variety of reporters and other sources made it quite clear that ZW has consistently and systematically been exporting aluminum extrusions that are simply welded together into what are essentially aluminum slabs.  While they claim these so-called ‘deep-processed’ extrusions are aluminum pallets, there is no evidence that ZW or any of its U.S. based operations market such a product.  It is simply incomprehensible that a company would export hundreds of millions of pounds of these extrusions into the U.S. without even marketing them.

The feedback we’ve received so far indicate that ZW intends to do with these extrusions what they have done in Mexico and Vietnam with similar schemes: sen…