Skip to main content

Keeping You in the Loop on AEC Fair Trade Issues

Since my last update, a few issues have been settled, and a couple more are pending.  I’ll use this update to bring you into the loop.  The curtain wall case has a hearing date (finally), our work with the EAPA program has shut down two operations, and the industry awaits a final decision in the RUSAL sanctions issue.  Meanwhile, there is no indication from the administration that they plan to grant Canada and Mexico an exclusion from 232 tariffs.

Curtain wall has been a big issue in the fair trade case in recent months.  The long awaited ‘final’ appeal on the scope decision to keep curtain wall covered by our orders has been set.  The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has scheduled oral argument on the Chinese exporters’ appeal of the Court of International Trade’s ruling that imports of Yuanda’s curtain wall units are subject to unfair trade tariffs on aluminum extrusions.  Oral arguments will be held at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, February 5th at the Court (717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC, Courtroom 203).  Confidence is high that we will once again prevail.  If that happens, the only remaining option for the opposition would be an appeal to the Supreme Court.  Keep in mind the Supreme Court hasn’t ruled on a trade case in many decades.  So, it appears this will conclude the legal fight.  However, we’ve all learned how persistent the Chinese can be in these matters.  So, I leave room for another effort, but it seems to me they can only do that if they introduce a brand new product and start from scratch.  I can’t imagine what that product will be since the decisions that have been made by the Department Commerce and the courts have been very broad.

We continue to be negatively affected by Chinese curtain wall extruders through suspected transshipments, mislabeling, and other circumvention schemes.  The AEC is working now to address that issue.  It is a big one, but we are getting ramped up for the fight.  Having two wins now through the Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA), we are confident Customs will address these complaints.  Any information your company may have in this matter will be helpful.

Later this month the U.S. Government will decide if RUSAL will be excluded from the Russian Sanctions.  The market seems confident this will happen.  The deadline for a decision is January 21, 2019. 

There is a great deal of pressure being put on the administration to exclude Mexico and Canada from the 232 tariffs.  So far, nothing has changed.  The AEC is monitoring the situation and participating as appropriate.

For the AEC, we will continue to focus on fair trade enforcement.  We’ve ramped up our resources and connected ourselves with Customs.  If you have any information about possible duty evasion, please let me know.  I get reports all the time from extruders that have seen business return from customers that were being supplied by these groups.  So, we can stop it!  This is our focus in 2019, and with your help we will get it done!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aluminum Extruders Coalition Files Historic Case; Customs Says “Yes”

Well, in case you missed it, a group of Aluminum Extruders Council members filed a historic AD/CVD case against 15 countries.  All 15 countries will be sued for dumping (AD), and four will be sued for subsidies (CVD).  In a press release issued earlier this week, which you can read here , the countries were identified as well as the projected duties the coalition seeks.  Anyone within the four walls of the Aluminum Extruders Council knew this was coming.  It has been discussed for four years.  To address rising imports, we battled in the enforcement arena, we went hard after products under assault in scope challenges and worked hard on the 232.  After exhausting every available option, and never seeing a dent in the import stats, we were faced with this hard decision.  That is where we are today.  The Hearing will be held later this month, and decisions will start to be rendered in the weeks that follow.  Communications about the details of this case will be handled by the Coalition,

A Nice Win to Start the Year!

 For months you’ve read my blog posts bemoaning the terrible decisions coming out of Washington D.C. related to our case.  Well, with the New Year, we have a fresh start.  And it’s a good one!  The industry has won its first Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) case involving fencing extrusions.  On December 20, 2023, Fortress withdrew its request for an administrative review, prompting U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) to terminate the administrative review entirely. Termination of the review makes the CBP’s affirmative determination of evasion final.  When terminating the review, CBP clarified that termination does not in any way preclude CBP or other agencies from pursuing additional enforcement actions against Fortress or imposing penalties should the need arise. The other EAPA fencing case is pending, and it appears the respondent is not participating.  We submitted voluntary factual information and the company in question did not submit written arguments by the November 6, 202

USITC Issues 332 to Assess Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Where Sustainability Meets Trade Policy

  The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) is undertaking a new factfinding investigation that will assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity of steel and aluminum produced in the United States.  As part of its investigation, the Commission will conduct a survey by issuing questionnaires to firms with facilities producing steel and aluminum in the United States, whether U.S. or foreign owned, to collect data on their production of these goods and associated GHG emissions. This survey will be mailed to all extruders in the United States.  The announcement made by the ITC on July 6, 2023, can be accessed here.  As requested, the USITC, an independent, nonpartisan federal agency, will prepare a public report.  The report will provide, to the extent practicable: GHG emissions intensity estimates of steel and aluminum produced in the United States by product category and production stage in 2022, with data on Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions defined as: Scope 1: Direct emissions