Skip to main content

Fair Trade Update

By

This month we will cover the latest developments in open matters within our case.  Appeals and scope requests dominated our attention.

Three appeals were filed this month.  The first is the Perfectus/Pallet case.  Perfectus has appealed their loss at the Court of International Trade (CIT).  We will work with the government in this matter to secure victory at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.  In the Tai-Ao 5050 case, the CIT sided with the Department of Commerce (DOC) in their decision that 5050 alloys are covered by our orders.  Now Tai-Ao has appealed this decision to the CAFC.  We will work with the government on this case as well.  Finally, the CIT is asking the CAFC to reject Jangho’s case.  In light of the losses suffered by Yulanda in their scope cases, the CIT is asking the CAFC not to waste its time on this pointless appeal.  I will keep you posted on these important cases.

We’ve also had some new scope challenges this month.  Scaffsales, who sells scaffolding, stadium seating, ladders, etc., is asking their imports of these products not be subject to our cases’ duties.  We will oppose this request, since this is exactly the type of work extruders do every day.  AIRpipe has re-filed their scope request regarding certain pipes and fittings.  These look very much like the extrusions the DOC has ruled as subject merchandise in the past.  So, we will oppose this one, as well.

Elsewhere, we expect a final determination in our circumvention case against Vietnam.  As you may recall, the DOC ruled in our favor with their preliminary decision.  So, the expectation is that the final determination will be a win for us.  There is no further news to report on the enforcement front this month.  However, the Fair Trade Committee members have started collecting trade data for legal review to help us track imports coming into the U.S.  Over the last few years, we’ve seen import percentages and volumes climb in the U.S.  SO, we are collecting data to track this in a more granular fashion.  Should further action be necessary, we will be ready to go.  If you are willing and interested in helping us, please contact me at jhenderson@tso.net, and I will get you the template.

Once again, I am pleased to report this good news to you about our case.  Your support and dedication to this case, the AEC, and your industry is impressive.  Thank you!

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Valuation, USMCA, and Fair Trade Priorities

By
 The primary focus of our government affairs work at this moment centers on the Section 232 valuation issue currently under discussion in Washington, D.C.  As highlighted during the recent Aluminum Summit and in prior AEC communications, there remains uncertainty regarding how the Administration intends to resolve this matter. The original Executive Order that established the Section 232 aluminum tariffs made clear that the tariffs were intended to apply to the full value of the imported aluminum extrusion, not solely the value of the aluminum content within the product.  At this time, it remains unclear whether the Administration will seek to address the issue by issuing a new Executive Order or by providing additional interpretive guidance through U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).  The AEC is actively monitoring these discussions and will update members as soon as a definitive course of action emerges. Parallel to the valuation discussions, attention is tur...
Post a Comment
Read more

Section 232 Updates & Enforcement Expands

By
 The Administration issued another update to the Section 232 steel, aluminum and copper tariff program on June 1.  The program now reaches a growing list of derivative products and downstream imported goods where aluminum content is part of a larger product. The June 1 action modifies several of the 232 product annexes and makes temporary adjustments for certain equipment categories.  According to the White House fact sheet, certain agricultural equipment and other equipment will be adjusted from a 25 percent tariff to a 15 percent tariff.  The action also expands the category of industrial equipment eligible for the temporary 15 percent tariff treatment to include certain mobile industrial equipment, such as bulldozers and forklifts, when imported from trade deal countries eligible for that treatment.  These temporary changes are scheduled to remain in place through December 31, 2027. There were also modifications to the HTS codes covered by the annexes.  ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Section 232 Update: Focus on Aluminum Derivative Products

By
 Over the past several weeks, we have started to get a clearer picture of how the updated Section 232 framework will impact aluminum, especially when it comes to derivative and finished products tied to the markets our members serve. The most important change is how the tariffs are applied. Covered products are now generally assessed on the full value of the imported product, rather than only the aluminum content. For finished goods, that is a meaningful change in how duty exposure is calculated. Looking at the annex structure, several key extrusion-driven products are now clearly defined. Aluminum windows, doors, and structural components (7610.10.00 and 7610.90.00) fall under Annex I-A and are generally subject to a 50% Section 232 tariff applied to full value. Trailers and aluminum ladders (8716.10.00 and 7616.99.5130) fall under Annex I-B and are generally subject to a 25% Section 232 tariff, also applied to full value. The takeaway is straightforward. Tariff treatment is drive...
Post a Comment
Read more