Skip to main content

AEC Meets with Department of Commerce about the Aluminum 232

By

 Last month the Aluminum Extruders Council (AEC) met with the Department of Commerce (DOC) to discuss our concerns with the Aluminum 232.  This meeting, which I was told we would never get because the new administration was simply too busy with their transition into power, was a direct result of our email campaign to our legislators last month executed by you, the members.  I want to call out Guy Charpentier with Bonnell Aluminum for his effort and result.  Working through the newly elected Senator Warnock’s office, Guy was able to persuade them to set this meeting up for us.  And, they did!

It was an excellent meeting.  We were happy to see several officials from the DOC attend, including the person responsible for the entire 232 program.  I had met with him earlier when the 232 was being considered.  I warned him of several risks to our market if the 232 was enacted.  This meeting set us up for a bit of a “I told you so!” moment.  They listened to us, and they told us they heard us.  We made it clear that we (still) opposed the 232 and demanded they reinstate the 232 extrusion tariffs they unilaterally dropped in December.  I am confident those tariffs will be reinserted.

The reason they dropped them was that no extruder had come forward to protest and exclusion requests for extruded products.  To minimize their workload, they concluded that if we aren’t going to protest, then they must not be important to us.  Therefore, if those tariffs come back online, we will have to take some stands when we see exclusion requests posted on the DOC’s site.  The AEC can help facilitate the communication about any such exclusion requests, but it can’t fight them.  That legal battle must be waged by extrusion companies. That is the law.  If we don’t fight the exclusions, they will drop the 232 tariffs again, and we will probably not get another bite of the apple.

The Biden Administration is reviewing the 232 and have not made it clear what their long-term plans are for the program.  In the near term, they are making it clear they will stay the course.  There is huge pressure on them to drop them entirely.  Manufacturers across the country are calling for the end to the tariffs.  On the other side, labor unions and the domestic producers make the case that they are dead in the water without the benefit of the 232.  Even though we are not the biggest group in the room, we are in a unique position.  We consume more than 20% of all aluminum used in the U.S. and we supply extrusions to most of the manufacturers that are lobbying against the 232.  That makes our speaking voice relevant to the discussion.  So, we will continue to work the issue, and I will continue to keep you updated.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 232 Implications: Get the Latest

By
 Recently, the AEC released a detailed fact sheet outlining the implications of Section 232 tariffs on aluminum imports, available for review on our website here. This document underscores our ongoing commitment to transparency and informed decision-making within our member base. Previously, we updated the 232 Derivative Products List to include a comprehensive breakdown of HTSUS codes and product descriptions, aimed at providing clarity for our stakeholders accessible here . Additionally, The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) within the Department of Commerce established a formal process for the addition of aluminum products designated the USHTS codes. The first window for submission opened on May 1, 2025, and closed on May 15, 2025. After the posting and public comment period occurs the BIS will make a final determination within 60 days. In addition to these regulatory updates, the Trump Administratio...
Post a Comment
Read more

Valuation, USMCA, and Fair Trade Priorities

By
 The primary focus of our government affairs work at this moment centers on the Section 232 valuation issue currently under discussion in Washington, D.C.  As highlighted during the recent Aluminum Summit and in prior AEC communications, there remains uncertainty regarding how the Administration intends to resolve this matter. The original Executive Order that established the Section 232 aluminum tariffs made clear that the tariffs were intended to apply to the full value of the imported aluminum extrusion, not solely the value of the aluminum content within the product.  At this time, it remains unclear whether the Administration will seek to address the issue by issuing a new Executive Order or by providing additional interpretive guidance through U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).  The AEC is actively monitoring these discussions and will update members as soon as a definitive course of action emerges. Parallel to the valuation discussions, attention is tur...
Post a Comment
Read more

Adjustments to the 232 Tariffs

By
 On June 3, 2025, an Executive Order (EO) was issued adjusting the Section 232 tariff on aluminum and aluminum derivative products (DPL) from 25% to 50%.  In addition to the adjustment in the 232 tariff, the EO also contains language that adjusts how the 232 tariff is applied. The following is a summary of the key points.  Aluminum and aluminum derivative products within HTS Ch. 76 and outside HTS Ch. 76: the 50% duty applies only to the aluminum content.  Any non-aluminum content in these products will be subject to the reciprocal tariff (currently at 10%).  This is a change from the February 10, 2025, EO for aluminum and aluminum derivative products in HTS Ch. 76 where the 232 tariff was applied to the full value of the product.  With the most recent EO, the 232 tariff now applies only to the aluminum content and the 10% reciprocal tariff applies to the non-aluminum content.  The current EO also changes how the 232 Auto tariffs, 232 aluminum tariffs ...
Post a Comment
Read more