Skip to main content

AEC Meets with Department of Commerce about the Aluminum 232

By

 Last month the Aluminum Extruders Council (AEC) met with the Department of Commerce (DOC) to discuss our concerns with the Aluminum 232.  This meeting, which I was told we would never get because the new administration was simply too busy with their transition into power, was a direct result of our email campaign to our legislators last month executed by you, the members.  I want to call out Guy Charpentier with Bonnell Aluminum for his effort and result.  Working through the newly elected Senator Warnock’s office, Guy was able to persuade them to set this meeting up for us.  And, they did!

It was an excellent meeting.  We were happy to see several officials from the DOC attend, including the person responsible for the entire 232 program.  I had met with him earlier when the 232 was being considered.  I warned him of several risks to our market if the 232 was enacted.  This meeting set us up for a bit of a “I told you so!” moment.  They listened to us, and they told us they heard us.  We made it clear that we (still) opposed the 232 and demanded they reinstate the 232 extrusion tariffs they unilaterally dropped in December.  I am confident those tariffs will be reinserted.

The reason they dropped them was that no extruder had come forward to protest and exclusion requests for extruded products.  To minimize their workload, they concluded that if we aren’t going to protest, then they must not be important to us.  Therefore, if those tariffs come back online, we will have to take some stands when we see exclusion requests posted on the DOC’s site.  The AEC can help facilitate the communication about any such exclusion requests, but it can’t fight them.  That legal battle must be waged by extrusion companies. That is the law.  If we don’t fight the exclusions, they will drop the 232 tariffs again, and we will probably not get another bite of the apple.

The Biden Administration is reviewing the 232 and have not made it clear what their long-term plans are for the program.  In the near term, they are making it clear they will stay the course.  There is huge pressure on them to drop them entirely.  Manufacturers across the country are calling for the end to the tariffs.  On the other side, labor unions and the domestic producers make the case that they are dead in the water without the benefit of the 232.  Even though we are not the biggest group in the room, we are in a unique position.  We consume more than 20% of all aluminum used in the U.S. and we supply extrusions to most of the manufacturers that are lobbying against the 232.  That makes our speaking voice relevant to the discussion.  So, we will continue to work the issue, and I will continue to keep you updated.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aluminum Extruders Coalition Files Historic Case; Customs Says “Yes”

By
Well, in case you missed it, a group of Aluminum Extruders Council members filed a historic AD/CVD case against 15 countries.  All 15 countries will be sued for dumping (AD), and four will be sued for subsidies (CVD).  In a press release issued earlier this week, which you can read here , the countries were identified as well as the projected duties the coalition seeks.  Anyone within the four walls of the Aluminum Extruders Council knew this was coming.  It has been discussed for four years.  To address rising imports, we battled in the enforcement arena, we went hard after products under assault in scope challenges and worked hard on the 232.  After exhausting every available option, and never seeing a dent in the import stats, we were faced with this hard decision.  That is where we are today.  The Hearing will be held later this month, and decisions will start to be rendered in the weeks that follow.  Communications about the details of this case will be handled by the Coalition,
Post a Comment
Read more

A Nice Win to Start the Year!

By
 For months you’ve read my blog posts bemoaning the terrible decisions coming out of Washington D.C. related to our case.  Well, with the New Year, we have a fresh start.  And it’s a good one!  The industry has won its first Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) case involving fencing extrusions.  On December 20, 2023, Fortress withdrew its request for an administrative review, prompting U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) to terminate the administrative review entirely. Termination of the review makes the CBP’s affirmative determination of evasion final.  When terminating the review, CBP clarified that termination does not in any way preclude CBP or other agencies from pursuing additional enforcement actions against Fortress or imposing penalties should the need arise. The other EAPA fencing case is pending, and it appears the respondent is not participating.  We submitted voluntary factual information and the company in question did not submit written arguments by the November 6, 202
Post a Comment
Read more

USITC Issues 332 to Assess Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Where Sustainability Meets Trade Policy

By
  The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) is undertaking a new factfinding investigation that will assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity of steel and aluminum produced in the United States.  As part of its investigation, the Commission will conduct a survey by issuing questionnaires to firms with facilities producing steel and aluminum in the United States, whether U.S. or foreign owned, to collect data on their production of these goods and associated GHG emissions. This survey will be mailed to all extruders in the United States.  The announcement made by the ITC on July 6, 2023, can be accessed here.  As requested, the USITC, an independent, nonpartisan federal agency, will prepare a public report.  The report will provide, to the extent practicable: GHG emissions intensity estimates of steel and aluminum produced in the United States by product category and production stage in 2022, with data on Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions defined as: Scope 1: Direct emissions
Post a Comment
Read more