Skip to main content

Great Preliminary Decision in Kingtom Case

By

 As you have been following for several months now, the AEC has been engaged in several legal battles with Kingtom, the Chinese owned and operated extrusion plant in the Dominican Republic.  To date, three separate EAPA filings have been made, and all have been successful.  Now, the legal arena has moved to our Annual Administrative Review in both our anti-dumping (AD) and subsidy (CVD) cases.  Just last week the Department of Commerce (DOC) issued its preliminary decision in this year’s review.  Commerce issued its preliminary results in the AD case on July 30.  Kingtom, the sole mandatory respondent, received the 86.01% China-wide rate, as did the other 84 companies for which we did not rescind our administrative review request.  In the CVD case, Kingtom and two other companies received the 242.15% China-wide rate, and three companies received the 16.08% ‘all others’ rate.  Until Kingtom can prove to the DOC that all exports from its operation consist of extrusions produced in the Dominican Republic, these rates will apply.  The final decision is expected in December.  If history is any guide, don’t expect this ruling to change between now and the end of the year.

In the last two weeks we have heard of up to three more schemes under way.  While I can’t divulge details, the combined volumes of these three separate operations total over 50 million pounds per year.  All three of these claims have come to the AEC from outsiders.  We are assessing the details and data to develop the legal strategy to address these.  The lesson here is to keep bringing your suspicions to us.  You never know; we may be hearing the same reports from others.  So, your voice helps build the credibility of these claims.

Some of you may be aware that the criminal trial in the fake pallet case has been under way for a couple of weeks.  Here is one report you may find interesting.   It is hard to speculate at this stage how the U.S. government will proceed, assuming they win.  We will be watching this closely in the coming weeks as the verdict is announced.

Next month at the Aluminum Summit I want to be sure you or someone from your company stops into our Fair-Trade Focus Session.  In that session, which will be closed to the media, we will openly discuss what we can about our findings.  We continue to run data on incoming shipments.  So, by conference, we ought to have some items to share.  The key to our success with this is marrying the data with the reality of what’s happening in the market.  That is where you can be helpful.  So, in this meeting we’ll get into the weeds with what we’ve learned and what you know.  At this point, we need to identify targets for investigation that can give us the biggest bang for our buck.  I look forward to seeing you there.

Thank you all for your continued support!  Stay safe!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aluminum Extruders Coalition Files Historic Case; Customs Says “Yes”

By
Well, in case you missed it, a group of Aluminum Extruders Council members filed a historic AD/CVD case against 15 countries.  All 15 countries will be sued for dumping (AD), and four will be sued for subsidies (CVD).  In a press release issued earlier this week, which you can read here , the countries were identified as well as the projected duties the coalition seeks.  Anyone within the four walls of the Aluminum Extruders Council knew this was coming.  It has been discussed for four years.  To address rising imports, we battled in the enforcement arena, we went hard after products under assault in scope challenges and worked hard on the 232.  After exhausting every available option, and never seeing a dent in the import stats, we were faced with this hard decision.  That is where we are today.  The Hearing will be held later this month, and decisions will start to be rendered in the weeks that follow.  Communications about the details of this case will be handled by the Coalition,
Post a Comment
Read more

A Nice Win to Start the Year!

By
 For months you’ve read my blog posts bemoaning the terrible decisions coming out of Washington D.C. related to our case.  Well, with the New Year, we have a fresh start.  And it’s a good one!  The industry has won its first Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) case involving fencing extrusions.  On December 20, 2023, Fortress withdrew its request for an administrative review, prompting U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) to terminate the administrative review entirely. Termination of the review makes the CBP’s affirmative determination of evasion final.  When terminating the review, CBP clarified that termination does not in any way preclude CBP or other agencies from pursuing additional enforcement actions against Fortress or imposing penalties should the need arise. The other EAPA fencing case is pending, and it appears the respondent is not participating.  We submitted voluntary factual information and the company in question did not submit written arguments by the November 6, 202
Post a Comment
Read more

USITC Issues 332 to Assess Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Where Sustainability Meets Trade Policy

By
  The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) is undertaking a new factfinding investigation that will assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity of steel and aluminum produced in the United States.  As part of its investigation, the Commission will conduct a survey by issuing questionnaires to firms with facilities producing steel and aluminum in the United States, whether U.S. or foreign owned, to collect data on their production of these goods and associated GHG emissions. This survey will be mailed to all extruders in the United States.  The announcement made by the ITC on July 6, 2023, can be accessed here.  As requested, the USITC, an independent, nonpartisan federal agency, will prepare a public report.  The report will provide, to the extent practicable: GHG emissions intensity estimates of steel and aluminum produced in the United States by product category and production stage in 2022, with data on Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions defined as: Scope 1: Direct emissions
Post a Comment
Read more