Skip to main content

Folks, Start Your Engines!

 Over the last few weeks, we have been working with our legal team to prepare for our Sunset Review.  We are now at a place where we need your help!  Later this month we will host a webinar to unveil this Review’s templates to capture our production and sales records.  The templates are essentially unchanged from our last review.  So, I don’t expect a lot of confusion about the data we need, but it does represent a lot of work!

This Sunset Review could be much more challenging than our 2017 filing.  Our industry is strong.  Demand is up, lead times have been extended, and there have been huge investments made in plants, equipment, and people over the last ten years.  By some measure, it could be claimed that we are healthy and strong and ready to take on China without the duties.  However, we all know this is a ridiculous conclusion.

Instead, we will want to argue that the only reason our industry has recovered and prospered is the fact that the orders were in place, effective, and gave the industry the confidence it needed to invest in operations and technical resources.  Of course, this positioned our industry in a way that we could support and grow with the automotive industry as they move to aluminum.  In other words, the orders have been effective, are still effective, and without them our industry would crumble under the weight of the illegal and unfair trade activities of the Chinese.

This is a huge moment for us.  Winning this case guarantees our orders will remain in place for another five years.  The renewal will continue to build confidence in our domestic industry and allow us to continue the modernization we so desperately need.  So, losing this case is not an option.

We can’t win without your support.  Pulling together your data and then allowing Wiley to aggregate it into a filing is the central piece of our request.  No data equals no case.  The more data we can collect, the stronger our case.   Specifically, getting a very high percentage of the domestic industry in the process sends the signal to the Feds that we are motivated and unified in our demand that trade protection against China remain in place.

So, look for the announcement of the upcoming Sunset Review Webinar and plan on getting your team on the line so they can understand the templates, the process, and timeline.  The webinar will be recorded so you can view it at any time.  Also remember, the AEC staff can NOT see your data.  If you send it to me, I will delete it immediately.  It needs to run through the attorneys to protect your data and protect your staff from antitrust violations.

At the end of the day, we all win or lose together.  It is the way this works.  For over 10 years we have remained unified and steadfast in this matter.  I expect we will continue down this very successful path. 

Thank you for your past support and thank you in advance for the work you will be providing!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aluminum Extruders Coalition Files Historic Case; Customs Says “Yes”

Well, in case you missed it, a group of Aluminum Extruders Council members filed a historic AD/CVD case against 15 countries.  All 15 countries will be sued for dumping (AD), and four will be sued for subsidies (CVD).  In a press release issued earlier this week, which you can read here , the countries were identified as well as the projected duties the coalition seeks.  Anyone within the four walls of the Aluminum Extruders Council knew this was coming.  It has been discussed for four years.  To address rising imports, we battled in the enforcement arena, we went hard after products under assault in scope challenges and worked hard on the 232.  After exhausting every available option, and never seeing a dent in the import stats, we were faced with this hard decision.  That is where we are today.  The Hearing will be held later this month, and decisions will start to be rendered in the weeks that follow.  Communications about the details of this case will be handled by the Coalition,

A Nice Win to Start the Year!

 For months you’ve read my blog posts bemoaning the terrible decisions coming out of Washington D.C. related to our case.  Well, with the New Year, we have a fresh start.  And it’s a good one!  The industry has won its first Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) case involving fencing extrusions.  On December 20, 2023, Fortress withdrew its request for an administrative review, prompting U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) to terminate the administrative review entirely. Termination of the review makes the CBP’s affirmative determination of evasion final.  When terminating the review, CBP clarified that termination does not in any way preclude CBP or other agencies from pursuing additional enforcement actions against Fortress or imposing penalties should the need arise. The other EAPA fencing case is pending, and it appears the respondent is not participating.  We submitted voluntary factual information and the company in question did not submit written arguments by the November 6, 202

USITC Issues 332 to Assess Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Where Sustainability Meets Trade Policy

  The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) is undertaking a new factfinding investigation that will assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity of steel and aluminum produced in the United States.  As part of its investigation, the Commission will conduct a survey by issuing questionnaires to firms with facilities producing steel and aluminum in the United States, whether U.S. or foreign owned, to collect data on their production of these goods and associated GHG emissions. This survey will be mailed to all extruders in the United States.  The announcement made by the ITC on July 6, 2023, can be accessed here.  As requested, the USITC, an independent, nonpartisan federal agency, will prepare a public report.  The report will provide, to the extent practicable: GHG emissions intensity estimates of steel and aluminum produced in the United States by product category and production stage in 2022, with data on Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions defined as: Scope 1: Direct emissions