Skip to main content

AEC Sharpens Fair Trade Focus after Win in Sunset Review

 I am delighted to report that the Department of Commerce has renewed our trade orders for another five years.  This time, the Sunset Review was a rout.  With no opposition to our filing, Commerce decided to expedite its decision, thus freeing us from a long and expensive full hearing this fall.  There was very little doubt our orders would be renewed, but we did not know how long it would take or how much it would cost.  Now we know.  

This summer we will be building on the momentum of our Sunset Review victory by focusing on two issues still unresolved: the Kingtom case, and the Aluminum 232 extrusion tariffs.  Both issues will take all of our focus.  

The Kingtom case took an unexpected turn a few weeks ago during the appeal of the first Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) case against them filed by Ta Chen.  Initially, Customs sided with Ta Chen and found that Kingtom was comingling Chinese-produced extrusions with Dominican extrusions for export to the U.S.  Following that, we filed two EAPA claims.  In all three matters Customs agreed that the evidence proved Kingtom had to be comingling extrusions with Chinese production in order to run the shapes and have the capacity to ship the volumes they were exporting to the U.S.  Unfortunately, Customs has reversed its findings in the Ta Chen case and will be looking closely at ours.  This is critical as we were also successful in persuading Commerce to extend our Chinese tariffs to Kingtom because of the comingling charge.  This could be a matter of when the first domino falls then they all fall.  Of course, we will not sit by and let this happen.

All this Kingtom legal maneuvering comes while Kingtom has been shut down by the Dominican government for labor abuses.  As AEC members know, Customs uncovered worker abuses during their onsite inspection of Kingtom during our third EAPA claim.  That information was communicated by Customs to the Dominican government who has responded by shutting them down.  Even so, we are not satisfied with this and will continue to pursue our Withhold Release Order (WRO) against Kingtom asking the U.S. government to forbid U.S. imports from Kingtom.  Both the EAPA appeals and the WRO are fluid issues and a huge focus for us this summer.

Next month, the Biden Administration will hold public hearings on the Section 232.  We have petitioned Commerce seeking reinstatement of the aluminum 232 tariffs on extrusions.  Since Commerce unilaterally dropped those tariffs, imports into the U.S. have surged.  From Mexico to Vietnam, imports now sit at 25% market share.  This is the highest level of import penetration since we filed our trade case against China.  Recently, we have been working with certain legislators to gain their support in carrying our message to Commerce.  I also met with officials from Commerce and Customs last week to discuss the Kingtom and 232 issues.  They are putting me in touch with the person in charge of the extrusion portion of the 232 program.  I am hopeful I can be persuasive about our position.  We not only need the tariffs put back in place, but we need an exclusion process that recognizes that dies may have to be built to make an objection to an exclusion request, and we need the AEC to be able to object on behalf of the industry.

These are critical issues for our industry at a time when our trade case is busier than ever.  Now that the Sunset Review is behind us, we can bear down on these two remaining hot topics.  As always, I will keep you posted.  Thank you for your continued support!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aluminum Extruders Coalition Files Historic Case; Customs Says “Yes”

Well, in case you missed it, a group of Aluminum Extruders Council members filed a historic AD/CVD case against 15 countries.  All 15 countries will be sued for dumping (AD), and four will be sued for subsidies (CVD).  In a press release issued earlier this week, which you can read here , the countries were identified as well as the projected duties the coalition seeks.  Anyone within the four walls of the Aluminum Extruders Council knew this was coming.  It has been discussed for four years.  To address rising imports, we battled in the enforcement arena, we went hard after products under assault in scope challenges and worked hard on the 232.  After exhausting every available option, and never seeing a dent in the import stats, we were faced with this hard decision.  That is where we are today.  The Hearing will be held later this month, and decisions will start to be rendered in the weeks that follow.  Communications about the details of this case will be handled by the Coalition,

A Nice Win to Start the Year!

 For months you’ve read my blog posts bemoaning the terrible decisions coming out of Washington D.C. related to our case.  Well, with the New Year, we have a fresh start.  And it’s a good one!  The industry has won its first Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) case involving fencing extrusions.  On December 20, 2023, Fortress withdrew its request for an administrative review, prompting U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) to terminate the administrative review entirely. Termination of the review makes the CBP’s affirmative determination of evasion final.  When terminating the review, CBP clarified that termination does not in any way preclude CBP or other agencies from pursuing additional enforcement actions against Fortress or imposing penalties should the need arise. The other EAPA fencing case is pending, and it appears the respondent is not participating.  We submitted voluntary factual information and the company in question did not submit written arguments by the November 6, 202

USITC Issues 332 to Assess Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Where Sustainability Meets Trade Policy

  The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) is undertaking a new factfinding investigation that will assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity of steel and aluminum produced in the United States.  As part of its investigation, the Commission will conduct a survey by issuing questionnaires to firms with facilities producing steel and aluminum in the United States, whether U.S. or foreign owned, to collect data on their production of these goods and associated GHG emissions. This survey will be mailed to all extruders in the United States.  The announcement made by the ITC on July 6, 2023, can be accessed here.  As requested, the USITC, an independent, nonpartisan federal agency, will prepare a public report.  The report will provide, to the extent practicable: GHG emissions intensity estimates of steel and aluminum produced in the United States by product category and production stage in 2022, with data on Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions defined as: Scope 1: Direct emissions