Skip to main content

It is Time for Us to Act!

 The summer of 2022 has been a disappointment to our Fair Trade efforts.  We continue to see our share of the domestic market shrink as foreign competitors enjoy a discount to U.S. aluminum prices, courtesy of the U.S. Aluminum 232.  The lack of minimum aluminum content requirements in the USMCA is creating a new threat south of our border.  

China’s Belt and Road strategy has established a growing extrusion operation in the Dominican Republic with rumors of more facilities to come in Latin America.  Our trade case continues to battle key scope issues with an administration that seems to have a deaf ear to our position.  Trade enforcement wins have turned to defeats without so much as an explanation.  This horrible combination of self-defeating U.S. policy and an administration in place that has been the softest defender of U.S. industry since Obama that left us in a position that requires us to make some very difficult decisions.

The aftermath of Customs’ inexplicable reversal in all its affirmative Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) decisions against Kingtom is perhaps the most difficult to swallow.  Everything about this matter speaks of a bad actor established with one purpose only: to destroy the U.S. market.  I want AEC members to know that this is NOT OVER!  We are filing our appeal and will be sure we have our day in court.  It’s not only the Kingtom issue that is at stake here.  The broader issue is the degradation of the EAPA program.  This has been an effective tool for us to fight trade violations.  However, recent decisions in our cases, and those in other industries, make it clear that the goalposts have moved regarding what Customs will now accept as proof of evasion.  Along with other industry leaders, the AEC is making its position known in every venue we can find.  

Also, the Federal Government has asked for a commentary and an examination into the USMCA and how it is playing out in the market.  The AEC will be participating in this process.  We must make it clear to lawmakers that not requiring a minimum North American aluminum content in the U.S. automotive market is a clear threat to the heavy investment we have made to support the move to lightweight vehicles.  We spoke about the ‘backdoor’ opportunity in Mexico for cheap Chinese aluminum to threaten our domestic market and its investments at the time the USMCA was negotiated.  Now we know that is exactly what is happening.  We cannot sit back and watch this occur.

Last month, I joined the aluminum panel during the 232 Hearings to discuss the impacts of the aluminum 232 on our industry.  The discussion was lively and quite interactive, especially for a formal meeting like this.  We know our points were heard and I continue to work behind the scenes to get access to the government officials responsible for this program and take our case right to them.  It is the 232 that has become the lubricant allowing all these other schemes and policy reversals to injure our industry.  As I said at the hearing, “In our world, spotting competitors a $.15 to .20/lb. price advantage upfront is akin to spotting Tom Brady two touchdowns in the fourth quarter!”  Frankly, I think the hearing was nothing more than window dressing.  That commission will finish its report from its findings and deliver it to Congress next March.  That means the Congress that gets the report will be different than the Congress that requested it.

Concerning scope issues, last week oral arguments were held in the Reflections Window and Wall case.  As you may recall, we lost this scope challenge and decided to appeal the decision.  While confidence is high and we hope the courts will side with us, we must understand that we will be opposed by the importer AND the Department of Commerce, since it was Commerce’s decision and they must defend it.  It will be a few months before we get the final decision.

From my seat in the auditorium, we can no longer depend on creative trade enforcement cases to protect us or rely on timely reversals from the government in counter-productive policies.  The AEC is not without options.  So, I really need you to come to the Fall Management Conference next month so we can discuss this in our breakout sessions, Town Hall, and then carry our message to Hill Day on Friday.  I hope to see you there.  

Thank you for your continued support.  We have accomplished so much together, which gives me confidence that we can overcome these challenges as well!  See you in D.C.!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Valuation, USMCA, and Fair Trade Priorities

 The primary focus of our government affairs work at this moment centers on the Section 232 valuation issue currently under discussion in Washington, D.C.  As highlighted during the recent Aluminum Summit and in prior AEC communications, there remains uncertainty regarding how the Administration intends to resolve this matter. The original Executive Order that established the Section 232 aluminum tariffs made clear that the tariffs were intended to apply to the full value of the imported aluminum extrusion, not solely the value of the aluminum content within the product.  At this time, it remains unclear whether the Administration will seek to address the issue by issuing a new Executive Order or by providing additional interpretive guidance through U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).  The AEC is actively monitoring these discussions and will update members as soon as a definitive course of action emerges. Parallel to the valuation discussions, attention is tur...

Section 232 Updates & Enforcement Expands

 The Administration issued another update to the Section 232 steel, aluminum and copper tariff program on June 1.  The program now reaches a growing list of derivative products and downstream imported goods where aluminum content is part of a larger product. The June 1 action modifies several of the 232 product annexes and makes temporary adjustments for certain equipment categories.  According to the White House fact sheet, certain agricultural equipment and other equipment will be adjusted from a 25 percent tariff to a 15 percent tariff.  The action also expands the category of industrial equipment eligible for the temporary 15 percent tariff treatment to include certain mobile industrial equipment, such as bulldozers and forklifts, when imported from trade deal countries eligible for that treatment.  These temporary changes are scheduled to remain in place through December 31, 2027. There were also modifications to the HTS codes covered by the annexes.  ...

Section 232 Update: Focus on Aluminum Derivative Products

 Over the past several weeks, we have started to get a clearer picture of how the updated Section 232 framework will impact aluminum, especially when it comes to derivative and finished products tied to the markets our members serve. The most important change is how the tariffs are applied. Covered products are now generally assessed on the full value of the imported product, rather than only the aluminum content. For finished goods, that is a meaningful change in how duty exposure is calculated. Looking at the annex structure, several key extrusion-driven products are now clearly defined. Aluminum windows, doors, and structural components (7610.10.00 and 7610.90.00) fall under Annex I-A and are generally subject to a 50% Section 232 tariff applied to full value. Trailers and aluminum ladders (8716.10.00 and 7616.99.5130) fall under Annex I-B and are generally subject to a 25% Section 232 tariff, also applied to full value. The takeaway is straightforward. Tariff treatment is drive...