Skip to main content

A Nice Win to Start the Year!

By

 For months you’ve read my blog posts bemoaning the terrible decisions coming out of Washington D.C. related to our case.  Well, with the New Year, we have a fresh start.  And it’s a good one!  The industry has won its first Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) case involving fencing extrusions.  On December 20, 2023, Fortress withdrew its request for an administrative review, prompting U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) to terminate the administrative review entirely. Termination of the review makes the CBP’s affirmative determination of evasion final.  When terminating the review, CBP clarified that termination does not in any way preclude CBP or other agencies from pursuing additional enforcement actions against Fortress or imposing penalties should the need arise. The other EAPA fencing case is pending, and it appears the respondent is not participating.  We submitted voluntary factual information and the company in question did not submit written arguments by the November 6, 2023, deadline.  CBP’s determination as to evasion is due January 15, 2024.  While this will not turn the entire industry around it is a big win.  The volumes in this case were huge and will fill a few presses in the U.S.

Other updates this month include another scope issue involving a challenge from Custom Metalcrafters that was subsequently dropped.  There is also an EAPA investigation underway in Mexico related to transshipped Chinese extrusions being fashioned into a kit for export into the U.S. from Mexico.  CBP conducted onsite verification at one of these Mexico facilities on November 13-16, 2023.  CBP’s verification report is forthcoming.  CBP extended the deadline for its evasion determination from December 21, 2023, until February 20, 2024, and issued a verification report on December 20, 2023. The deadline for written arguments is January 8, 2024, and the deadline for responses to written arguments is January 23, 2024.

Elsewhere, talk has increased that the General Approved Exclusions (GAEs) on the Aluminum 232 issue may finally come to a resolution in the coming weeks.  As you know we have fought hard to get the GGAEs removed from the 232 Aluminum Extrusion tariffs.  I am hopeful this will come to a good resolution for us, but we have been at this spot in the past only to be disappointed.  Should we prevail, we will have to develop a program in which the AEC monitors exclusion requests to inform members to object.  This paperwork nightmare is one we avoided in the past, only to lose our tariffs because of it.  So, this time, we must protest any objections.  The AEC will work with Mayer Brown, our attorneys in this matter, to build a template members can use to protest exclusion requests.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Victories and Struggles: Our Mission Persists

By
 On December 3, 2024, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) took action in issuing a forced labor finding against Kingtom Aluminio S.R.L. (“Kingtom”).  This victory for U.S. extruders is a culmination of years of effort between the AEC and United Steel Workers (USW), which started with the initial Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) allegation filed in 2019.  As a result of this finding, CBP has authorized all port directors to seize imports of aluminum extrusions from Kingtom.   For almost 15 years the Aluminum Extrusion Fair Trade Committee (AEFTC) has worked on a wide variety of trade activities.  In defending the China I case, the AEFTC has navigated the 232 Tariffs and has worked with other organizations on EAPA allegations, along with circumvention and transshipment issues.  Thank you to all who have contributed time and resources over the years!  However, there will be more work to do.  With a new administration and 2025 fast approa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Section 232 Implications: Get the Latest

By
 Recently, the AEC released a detailed fact sheet outlining the implications of Section 232 tariffs on aluminum imports, available for review on our website here. This document underscores our ongoing commitment to transparency and informed decision-making within our member base. Previously, we updated the 232 Derivative Products List to include a comprehensive breakdown of HTSUS codes and product descriptions, aimed at providing clarity for our stakeholders accessible here . Additionally, The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) within the Department of Commerce established a formal process for the addition of aluminum products designated the USHTS codes. The first window for submission opened on May 1, 2025, and closed on May 15, 2025. After the posting and public comment period occurs the BIS will make a final determination within 60 days. In addition to these regulatory updates, the Trump Administratio...
Post a Comment
Read more

“The Only Constant in Life is Change” – Heraclitus (Greek philosopher)

By
 No matter what side of the Presidential election you were in favor of, we knew the Administration was going to change.  For the AEC and Government Affairs we can find opportunities in these changes and work towards advancing our position with a new Administration and Congress.  The AEC is actively monitoring any potential changes, which could affect our efforts related to the 232/301 Tariffs, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Grant Funding, United States Trade Representative (USTR) Global Arrangement Negotiations and other items of interest.  On October 30, the International Trade Commission (ITC) voted to rescind the tariffs on aluminum extruded products determined by the Department of Commerce (DOC).  As we all know, the tariffs imposed under the China I case have played a major role in protecting the domestic industry and the hope was for this new case to increase the protections.  Unfortunately, that was not the case.  However, as we look forw...
Post a Comment
Read more