Skip to main content

Still Awaiting 232 News; China Scope Issues Settling

By

Currently, the trade agenda has largely been pursued by the Aluminum Extruders Coalition.  As they do the work and pay the bills to take this new case to its final hearing later this year, the AEC is still working on legacy matters with the original China case.  Additionally, we continue to work with Commerce to get the Generally Approved Exclusions (GAEs) removed from the Aluminum Extrusion 232.  

Unfortunately, we haven’t heard any word from D.C. on the 232, but I am led to believe a decision is imminent.  We continue to show evidence of aluminum extruders exporting from countries not a part of the coalition’s case as proof that the 232 still has a place in protecting our industry.  If you see a news item about a new extrusion operation in another country aimed at our market, please send it to me.  It should be noted that the Dominican Republic part of the Coalition’s case did not survive the preliminary round.  So, this is a clear example of how we need whatever protection we can get from the 232.  When news breaks on this issue, we will send an alert.

The existing China case still has a place in our trade defense.  The China1 case, as we call it, covers a number of end uses, but not all.  So, we will use the China1 case as the first test against a scope challenge, and if it’s not covered there, it will be covered in the new (China2) case.  So, keep that in mind as I report recent scope decisions.

This is good to know when we see the final decisions in the door threshold case, which has been a matter for several years.  You may recall that Endura appealed Customs and Border Protection’s (“CBP”) final determination in the EAPA proceeding concerning Columbia’s door thresholds to the Court of International Trade (“CIT”), and that Columbia also appealed the determination on other grounds.  In February 2023, Endura withdrew from the appeal.  The Department of Justice continued fighting against Columbia’s appeal.

Last month, the CIT remanded CBP’s final affirmative determination of evasion.  The court found, among other things, that the record does not support CBP’s finding that Columbia transshipped door thresholds from China through Vietnam and that “{a} Chinese-origin extruded aluminum component, if present within an assembled door threshold produced in Vietnam and imported into the United States by Columbia, would not convert such a good to “covered merchandise.”  The CIT ordered Customs to submit a remand redetermination by February 15, 2024, after which both Columbia and the DOJ will have an opportunity to comment.

This case illustrates how a tighter scope is important.  Hundreds of thousands of dollars have been spent on this case, and it dies in the courts.  Not only that, but it also makes us vulnerable to other companies with products that may come forward and say, “hey, if you’ve let them in, what about us?”.  The China1 case took us as far as we could go.  The new case will fill the gaps.  In the coming months there will be less news about China1 and more about how the industry is getting behind the trade case.

The new case has already started to fill order books, and many extruders have told me they plan to expand.  The question I will have for the AEC next month at the 75th Annual Meeting & Leadership Conference is, How Much Do You Want to Grow?  It appears to be a question only you can answer!

See you all soon and thank you for your continued trust and support in the AEC.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Valuation, USMCA, and Fair Trade Priorities

By
 The primary focus of our government affairs work at this moment centers on the Section 232 valuation issue currently under discussion in Washington, D.C.  As highlighted during the recent Aluminum Summit and in prior AEC communications, there remains uncertainty regarding how the Administration intends to resolve this matter. The original Executive Order that established the Section 232 aluminum tariffs made clear that the tariffs were intended to apply to the full value of the imported aluminum extrusion, not solely the value of the aluminum content within the product.  At this time, it remains unclear whether the Administration will seek to address the issue by issuing a new Executive Order or by providing additional interpretive guidance through U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).  The AEC is actively monitoring these discussions and will update members as soon as a definitive course of action emerges. Parallel to the valuation discussions, attention is tur...
Post a Comment
Read more

Section 232 Updates & Enforcement Expands

By
 The Administration issued another update to the Section 232 steel, aluminum and copper tariff program on June 1.  The program now reaches a growing list of derivative products and downstream imported goods where aluminum content is part of a larger product. The June 1 action modifies several of the 232 product annexes and makes temporary adjustments for certain equipment categories.  According to the White House fact sheet, certain agricultural equipment and other equipment will be adjusted from a 25 percent tariff to a 15 percent tariff.  The action also expands the category of industrial equipment eligible for the temporary 15 percent tariff treatment to include certain mobile industrial equipment, such as bulldozers and forklifts, when imported from trade deal countries eligible for that treatment.  These temporary changes are scheduled to remain in place through December 31, 2027. There were also modifications to the HTS codes covered by the annexes.  ...
Post a Comment
Read more

AEC Testifies at USMCA Hearing in Washington

By
Since the AEC’s last Government Affairs update, the Council participated in the U.S.–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA) hearing held in Washington, DC, from December 3–5. The hearing drew more than 200 participants representing a broad range of perspectives on the future of the agreement. The AEC appeared on a panel immediately following the steel industry, and it was noteworthy how closely aligned many of the challenges facing aluminum extruders are with those impacting steel producers—particularly with respect to trade enforcement, circumvention, and market distortion. These discussions reinforced the importance of maintaining a strong, competitive aluminum extrusion industry and underscored the essential role our sector plays as a supplier of critical inputs across construction, transportation, energy, and numerous other segments of the North American economy. During our testimony, the AEC used the hearing as an opportunity to highlight ongoing concerns regarding trade circumventio...
Post a Comment
Read more